Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Open Energy (Solar Tiles) »
Defendant: Open Energy
Alleges that certain Open Energy 34 watt Solar Tiles manufactured between 2007 and 2009 are defective, creating a fire hazard. Consumers are eligible for replacement or removal by an approved contractor or reimbursement for solar tiles already removed. Read More »
Open Energy (Solar Tiles) »
Defendant: Open Energy
Alleges that certain Open Energy 34 watt Solar Tiles manufactured between 2007 and 2009 are defective, creating a fire hazard. Consumers are eligible for replacement or removal by an approved contractor or reimbursement for solar tiles already removed.
×Floor and Decor Outlets of America, Inc. (Laminate Flooring) »
Defendant: Floor and Decor Outlets of America, Inc.
Consumers who bought Chinese-made laminate flooring between January 1, 2010 and August 1, 2015 from Floor and Decor Outlets of America may be eligible for $1.50 cash per square foot or $3 store credit per square foot. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting certain Chinese-made laminate flooring… Read More »
Floor and Decor Outlets of America, Inc. (Laminate Flooring) »
Defendant: Floor and Decor Outlets of America, Inc.
Consumers who bought Chinese-made laminate flooring between January 1, 2010 and August 1, 2015 from Floor and Decor Outlets of America may be eligible for $1.50 cash per square foot or $3 store credit per square foot. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting certain Chinese-made laminate flooring as complying with the California Air Resources Board standards for formaldehyde emissions.
×First Family Insurance, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: First Family Insurance, Inc.
Consumers who received two or more calls from First Family Insurance on or after October 24, 2010 without their prior express consent may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.9 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.… Read More »
First Family Insurance, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: First Family Insurance, Inc.
Consumers who received two or more calls from First Family Insurance on or after October 24, 2010 without their prior express consent may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.9 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Frontier Communications (TCPA) »
Defendant: Frontier Communications
Consumers who received telemarketing call from Frontier Communications between August 20, 2009 and January 25, 2017 without their prior express consent may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $11 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Final… Read More »
Frontier Communications (TCPA) »
Defendant: Frontier Communications
Consumers who received telemarketing call from Frontier Communications between August 20, 2009 and January 25, 2017 without their prior express consent may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $11 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Final Fairness Hearing is May 31, 2017.
×Procter & Gamble (Kandoo) »
Defendant: Procter & Gamble; Nehemiah
California consumers who bought Kandoo flushable wipes between March 21, 2010 and December 9, 2016 may be eligible for $1 per package up to maximum of ten packages per household. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “flushable’ and “sewer and septic safe” when… Read More »
Procter & Gamble (Kandoo) »
Defendant: Procter & Gamble; Nehemiah
California consumers who bought Kandoo flushable wipes between March 21, 2010 and December 9, 2016 may be eligible for $1 per package up to maximum of ten packages per household. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “flushable’ and “sewer and septic safe” when the products clogged the toilets and sewage system.
×Regions Bank (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Regions Bank
Regions Bank agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard or wind-only insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Regions Bank forced borrowers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard or wind-only insurance. The mortgage servicer received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who… Read More »
Regions Bank (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Regions Bank
Regions Bank agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard or wind-only insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Regions Bank forced borrowers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard or wind-only insurance. The mortgage servicer received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard or wind-only insurance premiums issued by certain insurance companies between January 1, 2009 and June 20, 2016 may be eligible to receive back up to 12.5% of the premium.
×Whirlpool (KitchenAid Refrigerators) »
Defendant: Whirlpool
California consumers who purchased KitchenAid-brand refrigerator with model numbers KSRG25FV** or KSRS25RV** may be eligible for $55 cash payment or 10% rebate on purchase price of a new KitchenAid-brand appliance. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the appliances with Energy Star logo when they did not meet… Read More »
Whirlpool (KitchenAid Refrigerators) »
Defendant: Whirlpool
California consumers who purchased KitchenAid-brand refrigerator with model numbers KSRG25FV** or KSRS25RV** may be eligible for $55 cash payment or 10% rebate on purchase price of a new KitchenAid-brand appliance. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the appliances with Energy Star logo when they did not meet Energy Star energy efficiency standards.
×Home Depot (ID Theft Protection) »
Defendant: Home Depot
To enroll in the 18 month complimentary Identity Guard Essentials (identity theft protection plan), Home Depot Data Breach class members must enter their redemption code on http://www.identityguard.com/homedepot/ by February 17, 2017. The redemption code can be used only once by the claimant. You can contact the settlement administrator at http://www.homedepotbreachsettlement.com/contact-us.aspx… Read More »
Home Depot (ID Theft Protection) »
Defendant: Home Depot
Source: http://www.homedepotbreachsettlement.com/contact-us.aspx
To enroll in the 18 month complimentary Identity Guard Essentials (identity theft protection plan), Home Depot Data Breach class members must enter their redemption code on http://www.identityguard.com/homedepot/ by February 17, 2017. The redemption code can be used only once by the claimant. You can contact the settlement administrator at http://www.homedepotbreachsettlement.com/contact-us.aspx
×Bank of America (Interest) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Bank of America (Interest) Bank of America agreed to a $29 million settlement over allegations of collecting post-payment interest without providing an FHA-approved payoff disclosure to borrowers who prepaid, inquired about pre-payment, or requested payoff figures. The class is defined as borrowers with FHA-insured loans that originated between June 1,… Read More »
Bank of America (Interest) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Bank of America (Interest)
Bank of America agreed to a $29 million settlement over allegations of collecting post-payment interest without providing an FHA-approved payoff disclosure to borrowers who prepaid, inquired about pre-payment, or requested payoff figures. The class is defined as borrowers with FHA-insured loans that originated between June 1, 1996 and January 20, 2015; the borrower or Bank of America held legal title when the total loan payment was zero; and Bank of America collected interest after the total loan payment was zero. Class members will automatically receive payment when the settlement becomes final. Final Hearing is Mar. 23, 2017.
×Telebrands (Pocket Hose or Pocket Top) »
Defendant: Telebrands
Consumers who bought certain Pocket Hose products between January 31, 2014 and November 4, 2016 may be eligible for (A) a full refund per product with the return of the product; or (B) $7 to $25 per product with a valid receipt submission; or (C) $7 cash total without a… Read More »
Telebrands (Pocket Hose or Pocket Top) »
Defendant: Telebrands
Consumers who bought certain Pocket Hose products between January 31, 2014 and November 4, 2016 may be eligible for (A) a full refund per product with the return of the product; or (B) $7 to $25 per product with a valid receipt submission; or (C) $7 cash total without a receipt submission. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false or deceptive advertisements.
×Alpha Gas and Electric (TCPA) »
Defendant: Alpha Gas and Electric
Consumers who received automated call from Alpha between July 1, 2011 and November 10, 2016 without their prior express consent may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $1.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Alpha Gas and Electric (TCPA) »
Defendant: Alpha Gas and Electric
Consumers who received automated call from Alpha between July 1, 2011 and November 10, 2016 without their prior express consent may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $1.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Dun & Bradstreet Creditbility Corp. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Dun & Bradstreet Creditbility Corp.
Consumers who received automatic, non-emergency telephone call on their cell phone or prerecorded call from Dun & Bradstreet without consenting to receive such calls from April 28, 2011 and January 31, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $10.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement… Read More »
Dun & Bradstreet Creditbility Corp. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Dun & Bradstreet Creditbility Corp.
Consumers who received automatic, non-emergency telephone call on their cell phone or prerecorded call from Dun & Bradstreet without consenting to receive such calls from April 28, 2011 and January 31, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $10.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×AmSher Collection Services, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: AmSher Collection Services, Inc.
Consumers who received automated call from AmSher between May 1, 2015 and July 31, 2015 without their prior express consent and were charged for the call may be eligible for up to $225 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
AmSher Collection Services, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: AmSher Collection Services, Inc.
Consumers who received automated call from AmSher between May 1, 2015 and July 31, 2015 without their prior express consent and were charged for the call may be eligible for up to $225 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Breathometer, Inc. (Original and Breeze) »
Defendant: Breathometer, Inc.
Consumers who purchased breathometer Original or Breeze will be eligible to receive full refunds. According to the Federal Trade Commission complaint, Breathometer falsely advertised that the breathalyzer devices could accurately calculate blood alcohol content and were “law-enforcement grade product.” The FTC also charged Breathometer with falsely claiming its products went… Read More »
Breathometer, Inc. (Original and Breeze) »
Defendant: Breathometer, Inc.
Consumers who purchased breathometer Original or Breeze will be eligible to receive full refunds. According to the Federal Trade Commission complaint, Breathometer falsely advertised that the breathalyzer devices could accurately calculate blood alcohol content and were “law-enforcement grade product.” The FTC also charged Breathometer with falsely claiming its products went through government-lab grade testing and knew that the results understated BAC levels.
×Caribbean Cruise Line (TCPA) »
Defendant: Caribbean Cruise Line
Consumers who received automated calls from Caribbean Cruise Line that offered a free cruise in exchange for taking a political or public opinion survey between August 1, 2011 and August 31, 2012 may be eligible for an estimated $500 per call. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations… Read More »
Caribbean Cruise Line (TCPA) »
Defendant: Caribbean Cruise Line
Consumers who received automated calls from Caribbean Cruise Line that offered a free cruise in exchange for taking a political or public opinion survey between August 1, 2011 and August 31, 2012 may be eligible for an estimated $500 per call. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×