![](https://www.consumer-action.org/images/Impact-Class-Actions.png)
Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Wells Fargo (Broker’s Price Opinions) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Mortgage borrowers who paid for Broker’s Price Opinions (“BPO”) in an amount greater than Wells Fargo had paid to the broker for the BPO between May 6, 2005 and July 1, 2010 may be eligible for pro rata share of the $50 million settlement. Class members will automatically receive payment… Read More »
Wells Fargo (Broker’s Price Opinions) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Mortgage borrowers who paid for Broker’s Price Opinions (“BPO”) in an amount greater than Wells Fargo had paid to the broker for the BPO between May 6, 2005 and July 1, 2010 may be eligible for pro rata share of the $50 million settlement. Class members will automatically receive payment when the settlement becomes final.
Final Hearing is Apr. 4, 2017.
×Milk Products (Antitrust) »
Defendant: Land O’ Lakes; National Milk Producers Federation aka CWT; Dairy Farmers of America Inc.; Dairylea Coop. Inc.; Agri-Mark Inc
Consumers in Arizona, California, DC, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, or Wisconsin who bought milk products from 2003 to the present may be eligible for payment in the range between $10 to $20. The companies reached a settlement over allegations… Read More »
Milk Products (Antitrust) »
Defendant: Land O’ Lakes; National Milk Producers Federation aka CWT; Dairy Farmers of America Inc.; Dairylea Coop. Inc.; Agri-Mark Inc
Source: https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/dairy-price-fixing/pressrelease/dairy-price-fixing-52-million-settlement-reached-over-dairy-indust
Consumers in Arizona, California, DC, Kansas, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia, or Wisconsin who bought milk products from 2003 to the present may be eligible for payment in the range between $10 to $20. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of price-fixing.
×MAPCO (Data Breach) »
Defendant: MAPCO
MAPCO agreed to a settlement as a result of a data breach disclosed by MAPCO on May 6, 2013. Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transaction at a MAPCO store between March 1, 2013 and April 30, 2013 may be eligible for up to $500 cash. Read More »
MAPCO (Data Breach) »
Defendant: MAPCO
MAPCO agreed to a settlement as a result of a data breach disclosed by MAPCO on May 6, 2013. Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transaction at a MAPCO store between March 1, 2013 and April 30, 2013 may be eligible for up to $500 cash.
×Hyundai (Sonata) »
Defendant: Hyundai
The lawsuit alleges certain 2011-2014 Hyundai Sonata models with a 2.0 liter or 2.4 liter gasoline direct injection engine have an engine defect that causes stalling, engine noise or oil lamp illumination. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for warranty extension, reimbursement for past repairs, and… Read More »
Hyundai (Sonata) »
Defendant: Hyundai
The lawsuit alleges certain 2011-2014 Hyundai Sonata models with a 2.0 liter or 2.4 liter gasoline direct injection engine have an engine defect that causes stalling, engine noise or oil lamp illumination. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for warranty extension, reimbursement for past repairs, and compensation if the car was sold or traded-in.
×CB1, Inc. (Surcharges) »
Defendant: CB1, Inc.
Consumers who paid a surcharge to CB1 when using a credit or debit card on or after October 22, 2013 may be eligible for an estimated $13.32 cash. Class members will automatically receive payment when the settlement becomes final. Final Fairness Hearing is May 24, 2017. Read More »
CB1, Inc. (Surcharges) »
Defendant: CB1, Inc.
Consumers who paid a surcharge to CB1 when using a credit or debit card on or after October 22, 2013 may be eligible for an estimated $13.32 cash. Class members will automatically receive payment when the settlement becomes final.
Final Fairness Hearing is May 24, 2017.
×Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Follett Higher Education Group, Inc.
Consumers who received automated text on their cell phones from Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. between October 9, 2011 and December 24, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $3.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection… Read More »
Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Follett Higher Education Group, Inc.
Consumers who received automated text on their cell phones from Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. between October 9, 2011 and December 24, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $3.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×BetterBody (Coconut Oil) »
Defendant: BetterBody Food & Nutrition, LLC
Consumers who bought BetterBody’s Extra Virgin Coconut Oil or Refined Coconut Oil between January 1, 2013 and November 18, 2016 may be eligible for up to $40. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as healthy. Read More »
BetterBody (Coconut Oil) »
Defendant: BetterBody Food & Nutrition, LLC
Consumers who bought BetterBody’s Extra Virgin Coconut Oil or Refined Coconut Oil between January 1, 2013 and November 18, 2016 may be eligible for up to $40. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as healthy.
×Wells Fargo (Mortgage Payoff) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Mortgage borrowers who received payoff statements that filed to disclose property insurance claim funds between June 23, 2014 and June 23, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $880,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to make disclosures required by Truth in… Read More »
Wells Fargo (Mortgage Payoff) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Mortgage borrowers who received payoff statements that filed to disclose property insurance claim funds between June 23, 2014 and June 23, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $880,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to make disclosures required by Truth in Lending Act.
Settlement checks were mailed to class members on June 7, 2017.
×Navy Federal Credit Union (TCPA) »
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Consumers who received automated calls to their cell phones from Navy Federal Credit Union between October 9, 2011 and September 15, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.75 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.… Read More »
Navy Federal Credit Union (TCPA) »
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Consumers who received automated calls to their cell phones from Navy Federal Credit Union between October 9, 2011 and September 15, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.75 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Wells Fargo (TCPA Overdraft) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call or text on their cell phones from Wells Fargo regarding overdrafts on a Wells Fargo account between April 21, 2011 and December 19, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $30 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over… Read More »
Wells Fargo (TCPA Overdraft) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call or text on their cell phones from Wells Fargo regarding overdrafts on a Wells Fargo account between April 21, 2011 and December 19, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $30 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×j2 Web Services (Late Fees) »
Defendant: j2 Web Services
Onebox and Phone People subscribers who were charged a late fee by j2 between August 26, 2010 and September 18, 2014 may be eligible for the cash value of one late fee or credit for one late fee. eVoice subscribers who were charged a late fee by j2 between August… Read More »
j2 Web Services (Late Fees) »
Defendant: j2 Web Services
Onebox and Phone People subscribers who were charged a late fee by j2 between August 26, 2010 and September 18, 2014 may be eligible for the cash value of one late fee or credit for one late fee. eVoice subscribers who were charged a late fee by j2 between August 26, 2010 and April 10, 0215 may be eligible for the cash value or one late fee or credit for one late fee.
×Honda (SCRA) »
Defendant: Honda
Servicemembers who leased a Honda or Acura and terminated the lease early under Servicemembers Civil Relief Act after January 1, 2008 and did not receive a pro rata refund of their down payment will be eligible for the pro rata refund of their down payment minus any missed payments or… Read More »
Honda (SCRA) »
Defendant: Honda
Servicemembers who leased a Honda or Acura and terminated the lease early under Servicemembers Civil Relief Act after January 1, 2008 and did not receive a pro rata refund of their down payment will be eligible for the pro rata refund of their down payment minus any missed payments or fees.
×Performance Lacrosse Group Inc. (Cascade R Lacrosse helmets) »
Defendant: Performance Lacrosse Group Inc.
Alleges that Cascade R lacrosse helmets were not in compliance with the National Operation Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment. Consumers who purchased the Cascade R lacrosse helmets between July 1, 2013 and November 20, 2014 that were subsequently retrofitted by PLG may be eligible for $10 Cascade merchandise voucher. … Read More »
Performance Lacrosse Group Inc. (Cascade R Lacrosse helmets) »
Defendant: Performance Lacrosse Group Inc.
Alleges that Cascade R lacrosse helmets were not in compliance with the National Operation Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment. Consumers who purchased the Cascade R lacrosse helmets between July 1, 2013 and November 20, 2014 that were subsequently retrofitted by PLG may be eligible for $10 Cascade merchandise voucher. Consumers who purchased the Cascade R lacrosse helmets between July 1, 2013 and November 20, 2014 that were not retrofitted may be eligible for $35 Cascade merchandise voucher.
×Fuddruckers (Kobe Beef) »
Defendant: Luby’s Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC
California consumers who purchased any menu item that was advertised to contain “Kobe” beef between November 26, 2010 and December 19, 2014 at certain restaurants may be eligible for $9 or $6 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “Kobe” beef as containing beef from… Read More »
Fuddruckers (Kobe Beef) »
Defendant: Luby’s Fuddruckers Restaurants, LLC
California consumers who purchased any menu item that was advertised to contain “Kobe” beef between November 26, 2010 and December 19, 2014 at certain restaurants may be eligible for $9 or $6 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “Kobe” beef as containing beef from the “Wagyu” bloodline of cattle in the Kobe region of Japan when the restaurants did not have “Kobe” beef.
×My Pillow, Inc. (False Advertising) »
Defendant: My Pillow, Inc.
Consumers who bought my Pillow products between April 26, 2012 and October 13, 2016 may be eligible for up to $10 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising and misleading My Pillow products. Read More »
My Pillow, Inc. (False Advertising) »
Defendant: My Pillow, Inc.
Consumers who bought my Pillow products between April 26, 2012 and October 13, 2016 may be eligible for up to $10 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising and misleading My Pillow products.
×