Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
VIZIO, Inc. (TV) »
Defendant: VIZIO, Inc.
Consumers who bought a VIZIO Smart TV between January 1, 2014 and June 23, 2014 and could not access Amazon Instant Video’s streaming content while connected to the internet may be eligible for a credit voucher for use on Amazon Instant Video. Read More »
VIZIO, Inc. (TV) »
Defendant: VIZIO, Inc.
Consumers who bought a VIZIO Smart TV between January 1, 2014 and June 23, 2014 and could not access Amazon Instant Video’s streaming content while connected to the internet may be eligible for a credit voucher for use on Amazon Instant Video.
×American Express (TCPA) »
Defendant: American Express
Consumers who received an automated telemarketing call on behalf of American Express between July 3, 2009 and March 15, 2016 may be eligible for about $50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
American Express (TCPA) »
Defendant: American Express
Consumers who received an automated telemarketing call on behalf of American Express between July 3, 2009 and March 15, 2016 may be eligible for about $50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×BP Solar and Home Depot (Solar Panel) »
Defendant: BP Solar and Home Depot
Alleges that certain BP solar panels manufactured between 1999 and 2007 with S-type junction boxes are defective, creating a fire hazard. Consumers are eligible for replacement by an approved contractor. The court approved the settlement on Dec. 22, 2016. Read More »
BP Solar and Home Depot (Solar Panel) »
Defendant: BP Solar and Home Depot
Alleges that certain BP solar panels manufactured between 1999 and 2007 with S-type junction boxes are defective, creating a fire hazard. Consumers are eligible for replacement by an approved contractor.
The court approved the settlement on Dec. 22, 2016.
×Home Depot (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Home Depot
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transaction at a self-checkout lane at Home Depot between April 10, 2014 and September 13, 2014 or received notice that their personal information was compromised may be eligible for a share of the $13 million settlement. Read More »
Home Depot (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Home Depot
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transaction at a self-checkout lane at Home Depot between April 10, 2014 and September 13, 2014 or received notice that their personal information was compromised may be eligible for a share of the $13 million settlement.
×Citizens Bank (TCPA) »
Defendant: Citizens Bank
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Citizens Bank between December 20, 2009 and July 31, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $4.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Citizens Bank (TCPA) »
Defendant: Citizens Bank
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Citizens Bank between December 20, 2009 and July 31, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $4.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Portfolio Recovery Associates (TCPA) »
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Portfolio Recovery Associates between December 23, 2006 and July 1, 2013 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $18 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Portfolio Recovery Associates (TCPA) »
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Portfolio Recovery Associates between December 23, 2006 and July 1, 2013 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $18 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Conopco, Inc. (Tresemmé Naturals) »
Defendant: Conopco, Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Tresemmé Naturals products may be eligible for $5 per product, with maximum of 10 products per household. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “natural” when not all the ingredients were natural. Read More »
Conopco, Inc. (Tresemmé Naturals) »
Defendant: Conopco, Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Tresemmé Naturals products may be eligible for $5 per product, with maximum of 10 products per household. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “natural” when not all the ingredients were natural.
×BMW (Water Pump) »
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
The lawsuit alleges that original water pump with thermo-plastic housing in certain BMW MINI vehicles produced between October 2006 and November 2012 were defective. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for cash reimbursement of costs of repairs before the effective settlement date or replacement of failed… Read More »
BMW (Water Pump) »
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
The lawsuit alleges that original water pump with thermo-plastic housing in certain BMW MINI vehicles produced between October 2006 and November 2012 were defective. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for cash reimbursement of costs of repairs before the effective settlement date or replacement of failed water pumps after the effective settlement date.
×Massage Envy (Unutilized Massages) »
Defendant: Massage Envy
Alleges that the expiration of unused accrued massages after the end of the membership period breached the membership agreement. Consumers whose membership ended between March 7, 2015 and June 30, 2016 and have at least one accrued unused 50-minute massage may be eligible for 75% of the unused massages reinstated. … Read More »
Massage Envy (Unutilized Massages) »
Defendant: Massage Envy
Alleges that the expiration of unused accrued massages after the end of the membership period breached the membership agreement. Consumers whose membership ended between March 7, 2015 and June 30, 2016 and have at least one accrued unused 50-minute massage may be eligible for 75% of the unused massages reinstated. Consumers whose membership is current as of June 30, 2016 and have at least one accrued unused 50-minute massage may be eligible for either 60 days extension after the end of the membership period to use all the accrued massages or 180 days after the end of the membership period to use 75% of the unused massages.
×Mercola.com (Indoor Tanning Beds) »
Defendant: Mercola.com
Mercola.com will provide $5.3 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding the Mercola.com’s deceptive advertisement of its indoor tanning devices. According to the FTC complaint, Mercola.com’s claims that its tanning devices are safe and reverse signs of aging were not supported by science. Consumers who purchased… Read More »
Mercola.com (Indoor Tanning Beds) »
Defendant: Mercola.com
Mercola.com will provide $5.3 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding the Mercola.com’s deceptive advertisement of its indoor tanning devices. According to the FTC complaint, Mercola.com’s claims that its tanning devices are safe and reverse signs of aging were not supported by science. Consumers who purchased Merocola brands of indoor tanning systems since January 1, 2012 may be eligible for a refund.
×Catalina Channel Express (FACTA) »
Defendant:
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between March 6, 2013 and March 9, 2015 at Catalina Express store in Califonia may be eligible for up to $250 cash. The company reached… Read More »
Catalina Channel Express (FACTA) »
Defendant:
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between March 6, 2013 and March 9, 2015 at Catalina Express store in Califonia may be eligible for up to $250 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
×PayPal (EFTA) »
Defendant: PayPal
Current and former PayPal users with an active PayPal account between April 19, 2006 and November 5, 2015 whose account was placed on hold or suspended or closed may be eligible for payment in the range between $3 and $440. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to… Read More »
PayPal (EFTA) »
Defendant: PayPal
Current and former PayPal users with an active PayPal account between April 19, 2006 and November 5, 2015 whose account was placed on hold or suspended or closed may be eligible for payment in the range between $3 and $440. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to comply with the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. If you received class notice on or before April 10, 2016, your deadline to file a claim, object to the settlement or exclude yourself from the settlement has passed.
×Western Union (Money Transfer) »
Defendant: Western Union
Consumers who initiated a money transfer with Western Union between January 1, 2001 and January 3, 2013 that was never redeemed may be eligible for a lump sum cash refund. The company initially reached a settlement over allegations of failing to timely notify consumers that the money transfers was not… Read More »
Western Union (Money Transfer) »
Defendant: Western Union
Consumers who initiated a money transfer with Western Union between January 1, 2001 and January 3, 2013 that was never redeemed may be eligible for a lump sum cash refund. The company initially reached a settlement over allegations of failing to timely notify consumers that the money transfers was not redeemed. The settlement was approved on June 25, 2013 but the case is now in appeals.
×Whirlpool (Front-Loading Washing Machine) »
Defendant: Whirlpool
Consumers who purchased or received as a gift certain 2001-2010 Whirlpool or Sears front-loading washing machines models may be eligible for $50 cash payment; or cash rebate of either 20% or 5% off retail purchase price of new washing machine or dryer; reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses up to $500. The… Read More »
Whirlpool (Front-Loading Washing Machine) »
Defendant: Whirlpool
Consumers who purchased or received as a gift certain 2001-2010 Whirlpool or Sears front-loading washing machines models may be eligible for $50 cash payment; or cash rebate of either 20% or 5% off retail purchase price of new washing machine or dryer; reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses up to $500. The company reached a settlement over allegations of manufacturing, advertising, and selling defective washing machines that develop mold, mildew, bacteria, and foul odors.
×LG (Front-loading Washing Machine) »
Defendant: LG
Consumers who purchased LG front-loading washing machines between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2006 may be eligible for $35 cash payment or $105 washer rebate certificate for the purchase of a new washer. The company reached a settlement over allegations of manufacturing, advertising, and selling defective washing machines that… Read More »
LG (Front-loading Washing Machine) »
Defendant: LG
Consumers who purchased LG front-loading washing machines between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2006 may be eligible for $35 cash payment or $105 washer rebate certificate for the purchase of a new washer. The company reached a settlement over allegations of manufacturing, advertising, and selling defective washing machines that develop mold, mildew, bacteria, and foul odors.
×