Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Navy Federal Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Current and former account holders who were charged overdraft fees when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction between July 22, 2012 and November 20, 2017 (except for accountholders who enrolled in overdraft protection after February 13, 2017) may be eligible for payment. Class members will automatically… Read More »
Navy Federal Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union
Current and former account holders who were charged overdraft fees when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction between July 22, 2012 and November 20, 2017 (except for accountholders who enrolled in overdraft protection after February 13, 2017) may be eligible for payment. Class members will automatically receive payment.
Final Approval Hearing is May 20, 2019. Order Granting Final Approval was May 28, 2019. Settlement Check Distribution was August 29, 2019.
×CenturyLink (repsweb.centurylink.com) »
Defendant: CenturyLink
Current and former CenturyLink customers whose CenturyLink bills were exposed online at a URL beginning with “repsweb.centurylink.com” between March 5, 2017 and May 18, 2017 may be eligible for credit monitoring. Current and former CenturyLink customers whose CenturyLink bills that were exposed online at a URL beginning with “repsweb.centurylink.com” and… Read More »
CenturyLink (repsweb.centurylink.com) »
Defendant: CenturyLink
Current and former CenturyLink customers whose CenturyLink bills were exposed online at a URL beginning with “repsweb.centurylink.com” between March 5, 2017 and May 18, 2017 may be eligible for credit monitoring. Current and former CenturyLink customers whose CenturyLink bills that were exposed online at a URL beginning with “repsweb.centurylink.com” and included information about their DirecTV Service between March 5, 2017 and May 18, 2017 may be eligible for payment and credit monitoring. Class members will automatically receive the benefits.
Final Approval Hearing is Jun. 14, 2019
×Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp (401(k) plan) »
Defendant: Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp
Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp. agreed to a $21.9 million settlement over claims that it mismanaged its employees’ retirement savings by offering an in-house 401(k) plan that had excessive fees and poor investments options. Deustche Bank Matched Savings Plan participants and beneficiaries whose individual accounts were invested in the disputed investments… Read More »
Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp (401(k) plan) »
Defendant: Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp
Source: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/employee-benefits/deutsche-bank-inks-219m-deal-to-end-401-k-fee-class-action-1
Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp. agreed to a $21.9 million settlement over claims that it mismanaged its employees’ retirement savings by offering an in-house 401(k) plan that had excessive fees and poor investments options. Deustche Bank Matched Savings Plan participants and beneficiaries whose individual accounts were invested in the disputed investments between December 21, 2009 and August 14, 2018 may be eligible for payment. The case is Moreno v. Deutsche Bank Am. Holding Corp., E.D.N.Y., No. 1:15-cv-09936.
×State Farm (Vehicle Casualty Insurance Policy) »
Defendant: State Farm
State Farm vehicle casualty insurance policyholders (except those residing in Arkansas and Tennessee) who made claim for vehicle repairs and had non-factory authorized or non-OEM crash parts installed between July 28, 1987 and February 24, 1998 may be eligible for payment. Class members will automatically receive payment. Arkansas and Tennessee… Read More »
State Farm (Vehicle Casualty Insurance Policy) »
Defendant: State Farm
State Farm vehicle casualty insurance policyholders (except those residing in Arkansas and Tennessee) who made claim for vehicle repairs and had non-factory authorized or non-OEM crash parts installed between July 28, 1987 and February 24, 1998 may be eligible for payment. Class members will automatically receive payment. Arkansas and Tennessee residents will need to submit a claim form to receive payment.
Final Fairness Hearing is Dec. 13, 2018.
×Wells Fargo (FHA Interest) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo agreed to a $30 million settlement over allegations of collecting post-payment interest without providing an FHA-approved payoff disclosure to borrowers who prepaid, inquired about pre-payment, or requested payoff figures. The class is defined as borrowers with FHA-insured loans that originated between June 1, 1996 and January 20, 2015; the… Read More »
Wells Fargo (FHA Interest) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo agreed to a $30 million settlement over allegations of collecting post-payment interest without providing an FHA-approved payoff disclosure to borrowers who prepaid, inquired about pre-payment, or requested payoff figures. The class is defined as borrowers with FHA-insured loans that originated between June 1, 1996 and January 20, 2015; the borrower or Wells Fargo held legal title when the total loan payment was zero; and Wells Fargo collected interest after the total loan payment was zero. Class members will automatically receive payment when the settlement becomes final.
Final Fairness Hearing is Nov. 20, 2018.
×Campus Debt Solutions (TCPA) »
Defendant: Campus Debt Solutions
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded calls to their cell phones from advertising Campus Debt Solutions student loan consolidation and loan forgiveness services on or after October 16, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $1.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »
Campus Debt Solutions (TCPA) »
Defendant: Campus Debt Solutions
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded calls to their cell phones from advertising Campus Debt Solutions student loan consolidation and loan forgiveness services on or after October 16, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $1.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Final Approval Hearing is Nov. 15, 2018
×Ford (Takata Airbags) »
Defendant: Ford
Alleges that certain Ford vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Ford vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between June 19, 2014 and September 5, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease… Read More »
Ford (Takata Airbags) »
Defendant: Ford
Alleges that certain Ford vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Ford vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between June 19, 2014 and September 5, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Ford vehicles as of September 8, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
Final Fairness Hearing is Dec. 11, 2018.
×Honda (CR-V) »
Defendant: Honda
Alleges that certain 2015 Honda CR-V vehicles are prone to unpleasant vibrations. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs. Final Hearing is Nov. 6, 2018. Read More »
Honda (CR-V) »
Defendant: Honda
Alleges that certain 2015 Honda CR-V vehicles are prone to unpleasant vibrations. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs.
Final Hearing is Nov. 6, 2018.
×Ally Financial, Inc. (SmartLease) »
Defendant: Ally Financial, Inc.
Alleges that Ally charged impermissible documentary or dealer fees when the consumers exercised the purchase option in their SmartLease contract. Consumers who were charged documentary or dealer fees in connection with the purchase option in the SmartLease between June 4, 2009 and June 18, 2018 may be eligible for a… Read More »
Ally Financial, Inc. (SmartLease) »
Defendant: Ally Financial, Inc.
Alleges that Ally charged impermissible documentary or dealer fees when the consumers exercised the purchase option in their SmartLease contract. Consumers who were charged documentary or dealer fees in connection with the purchase option in the SmartLease between June 4, 2009 and June 18, 2018 may be eligible for a full refund of the documentary/dealer fee.
Final Approval Hearing is Oct. 11, 2018. Deadline to submit a claim is no later than 90 days after the effective date of the settlement.
×Tesla (Enhanced Autopilot) »
Defendant: Tesla
Alleges Tesla failed to release Enhanced Autopilot features as scheduled. Consumers who bought Enhanced Autopilot feature with Tesla Hardware 2 Model S or Model X vehicle delivered to them on or before September 30, 2017 may be eligible for cash payment. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Approval Hearing is… Read More »
Tesla (Enhanced Autopilot) »
Defendant: Tesla
Alleges Tesla failed to release Enhanced Autopilot features as scheduled. Consumers who bought Enhanced Autopilot feature with Tesla Hardware 2 Model S or Model X vehicle delivered to them on or before September 30, 2017 may be eligible for cash payment. Class members will automatically receive payment.
Final Approval Hearing is Oct. 17, 2018.
×Big O Tires, LLC (Vehicle Service Contracts) »
Defendant: Big O Tires, LLC
California consumers who bought “Tire Protection Package,” “Service Central Road Hazard,” “King Royal Tire Service” or other vehicle service contracts offering road hazard protection from Big O Tires and a tire installation package with lifetime balancing during the same transaction on or after January 2, 2009 may be eligible for… Read More »
Big O Tires, LLC (Vehicle Service Contracts) »
Defendant: Big O Tires, LLC
California consumers who bought “Tire Protection Package,” “Service Central Road Hazard,” “King Royal Tire Service” or other vehicle service contracts offering road hazard protection from Big O Tires and a tire installation package with lifetime balancing during the same transaction on or after January 2, 2009 may be eligible for $20.54 cash or $25.41 Big O Tires coupon. California consumers who bought “Tire Protection Package,” “Service Central Road Hazard,” “King Royal Tire Service” or other vehicle service contracts offering road hazard protection from Big O Tires on or after January 2, 2009 may be eligible for $12.46 cash or $15.47 Big O Tires coupon.
×Cylindrical Lithium Ion Battery Cells (Antitrust) »
Defendant: LG Chem; Hitachi Maxell; NEC
Consumers who purchased certain products that contained cylindrical lithium ion batteries between January 1, 2000 and May 31, 2011 may be eligible for payment. The company agreed to a settlement over allegations of price-fixing. Read More »
Cylindrical Lithium Ion Battery Cells (Antitrust) »
Defendant: LG Chem; Hitachi Maxell; NEC
Consumers who purchased certain products that contained cylindrical lithium ion batteries between January 1, 2000 and May 31, 2011 may be eligible for payment. The company agreed to a settlement over allegations of price-fixing.
×Chase Bank (Credit Reports) »
Defendant: Chase Bank
Credit card accountholders whose credit card accounts were charged off by Chase Bank and sold to a collection agency on or after January 1, 2008 and were discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy may be eligible for payment. Alleges that Chase Bank failed to update the information to the credit reporting… Read More »
Chase Bank (Credit Reports) »
Defendant: Chase Bank
Credit card accountholders whose credit card accounts were charged off by Chase Bank and sold to a collection agency on or after January 1, 2008 and were discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy may be eligible for payment. Alleges that Chase Bank failed to update the information to the credit reporting agencies regarding the credit card accounts.
×Anthem (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Anthem
Anthem agreed to a settlement as a result of a cyber attack on Anthem’s databases, which approximately 79 million people’s information was stolen. Anthem announced the data breach in February 2015. Class members are eligible for cash payment or free credit monitoring; fraud resolution services; and reimbursement for out-pocket losses.… Read More »
Anthem (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Anthem
Source: https://anthemdatabreachlitigation.girardgibbs.com/
Anthem agreed to a settlement as a result of a cyber attack on Anthem’s databases, which approximately 79 million people’s information was stolen. Anthem announced the data breach in February 2015. Class members are eligible for cash payment or free credit monitoring; fraud resolution services; and reimbursement for out-pocket losses.
×Square, Inc. (Caviar) »
Defendant: Square, Inc.
Alleges that Square misrepresented the gratuity line on the invoice as being paid to delivery couriers when Square kept the funds charged as gratuity for itself. Consumers who purchased food delivered by Caviar (trycaviar.com) between January 20, 2012 and August 31, 2015 may be eligible for a one-time $15.28 credit for… Read More »
Square, Inc. (Caviar) »
Defendant: Square, Inc.
Source: http://cases.gcginc.com/pdf/JAS/Long_Form_Notice.pdf
Alleges that Square misrepresented the gratuity line on the invoice as being paid to delivery couriers when Square kept the funds charged as gratuity for itself. Consumers who purchased food delivered by Caviar (trycaviar.com) between January 20, 2012 and August 31, 2015 may be eligible for a one-time $15.28 credit for use with Caviar delivery. Class members will automatically receive account credit.
Final Approval Hearing is Sep. 21, 2018.
×