Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
First Niagara Bank (Satisfaction of Mortgage) »
Defendant: First Niagara Bank
Consumers who own residential property in New York with a mortgage serviced by First Niagara Bank between July 19, 2010 and November 14, 2014 and have paid the loan in full but First Niagara Bank did not present a satisfaction of mortgage to the county clerk within 30 days may… Read More »
First Niagara Bank (Satisfaction of Mortgage) »
Defendant: First Niagara Bank
Consumers who own residential property in New York with a mortgage serviced by First Niagara Bank between July 19, 2010 and November 14, 2014 and have paid the loan in full but First Niagara Bank did not present a satisfaction of mortgage to the county clerk within 30 days may be eligible for up to $750. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to transmit a satisfaction of mortgage to the county clerk within the time required by New York law.
×Shire U.S., Inc. and Shire, LLC (Adderall XR) »
Defendant: Shire U.S., Inc. and Shire, LLC
Consumers who bought and paid the purchase price of Adderall XR between January 1, 2007 and April 11, 2016 may be eligible for up to $16 for each prescription. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of delaying the less expensive generic version of Adderall XR and anticompetitive behavior. Read More »
Shire U.S., Inc. and Shire, LLC (Adderall XR) »
Defendant: Shire U.S., Inc. and Shire, LLC
Consumers who bought and paid the purchase price of Adderall XR between January 1, 2007 and April 11, 2016 may be eligible for up to $16 for each prescription. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of delaying the less expensive generic version of Adderall XR and anticompetitive behavior.
×Subaru (Oil Consumption) »
Defendant: Subaru
The lawsuit alleges that certain 2011 – 2015 Subaru vehicles were defectively designed to consume excess engine oil. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for extended warranty, cash reimbursement of costs of repairs or free or discounted repairs. Read More »
Subaru (Oil Consumption) »
Defendant: Subaru
The lawsuit alleges that certain 2011 – 2015 Subaru vehicles were defectively designed to consume excess engine oil. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for extended warranty, cash reimbursement of costs of repairs or free or discounted repairs.
×Mercedes-Benz (Rear Air Conditioning Unit) »
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz
The lawsuit alleges that certain 2010-2014 model year Mercedes-Benz vehicles or Freightliner Sprinter 2500 or 3500 vans with rear air conditioning units were defective, leaking water into the interior of the vehicles. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for extended warranty and cash reimbursement of costs… Read More »
Mercedes-Benz (Rear Air Conditioning Unit) »
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz
The lawsuit alleges that certain 2010-2014 model year Mercedes-Benz vehicles or Freightliner Sprinter 2500 or 3500 vans with rear air conditioning units were defective, leaking water into the interior of the vehicles. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for extended warranty and cash reimbursement of costs of repairs.
×Rexall (Glucosamine) »
Defendant: Rexall Sundown, Inc.; NBTY, Inc.
Consumers who purchased certain joint health dietary supplements containing glucosamine that were manufactured or sold by Rexall Sundown, Inc. or NBTY, Inc. may be eligible for up to $104. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of false and deceptive advertisement of certain claims on the labels. Read More »
Rexall (Glucosamine) »
Defendant: Rexall Sundown, Inc.; NBTY, Inc.
Consumers who purchased certain joint health dietary supplements containing glucosamine that were manufactured or sold by Rexall Sundown, Inc. or NBTY, Inc. may be eligible for up to $104. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of false and deceptive advertisement of certain claims on the labels.
×Garmin (Forerunner 610 Watch) »
Defendant: Garmin
Alleges that certain Garmin Forerunner 610 watchbands are defective. Consumers who bought a Garmin Forerunner 610 watch between April 2011 and July 2014 may be eligible for free repair or replacement of the watch or watchband; or reimbursement of repair or replacement costs; and extended one-year warranty. Read More »
Garmin (Forerunner 610 Watch) »
Defendant: Garmin
Alleges that certain Garmin Forerunner 610 watchbands are defective. Consumers who bought a Garmin Forerunner 610 watch between April 2011 and July 2014 may be eligible for free repair or replacement of the watch or watchband; or reimbursement of repair or replacement costs; and extended one-year warranty.
×Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. between October 26, 2008 and May 10, 2016 may be eligible for up to $150 cash, depending on the amount of valid claims. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection… Read More »
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. between October 26, 2008 and May 10, 2016 may be eligible for up to $150 cash, depending on the amount of valid claims. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Zara (FACTA) »
Defendant: Zara
Consumers who conducted credit card transactions or debit card transactions without a PIN being used and received a printed receipt that contained the first six digits of the consumer’s credit or debit card at a Zara retail store between April 28, 2015 and July 1, 2015 may be eligible for… Read More »
Zara (FACTA) »
Defendant: Zara
Consumers who conducted credit card transactions or debit card transactions without a PIN being used and received a printed receipt that contained the first six digits of the consumer’s credit or debit card at a Zara retail store between April 28, 2015 and July 1, 2015 may be eligible for up to $100 per transaction. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
×Cablevision Systems Corp. (Set-Top Boxes) »
Defendant: Cablevision Systems Corp.
Alleges requirement of leasing set-top boxes violated state and federal laws and resulted in higher prices for the set-top boxes. Current New Jersey, Connecticut, and New York subscribers who paid a monthly fee for the set-top boxes lease between April 30, 2004 and March 9, 2016 may be eligible for… Read More »
Cablevision Systems Corp. (Set-Top Boxes) »
Defendant: Cablevision Systems Corp.
Alleges requirement of leasing set-top boxes violated state and federal laws and resulted in higher prices for the set-top boxes. Current New Jersey, Connecticut, and New York subscribers who paid a monthly fee for the set-top boxes lease between April 30, 2004 and March 9, 2016 may be eligible for free 4 month SundanceNow subscription and a one-time credit ranging from $20 to $40; or free mulit-room DVR service ranging from 5 months to eleven months; or additional set-top box up to 18 months. Former New Jersey, Connecticut, and New York subscribers who paid a monthly fee for the set-top boxes lease between April 30, 2004 and March 9, 2016 may be eligible for free 4 month SundanceNow subscription and a one time cash payment ranging from $20 to $40.
×Vitamin Shoppe (Reservie Trans-Resveratrol) »
Defendant: Vitamin Shoppe
Consumers who purchased Reservie Trans-Resveratrol dietary supplement product between January 1, 2011 and June 6, 2016 may be eligible for up to $25 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the ingredients in the products. Read More »
Vitamin Shoppe (Reservie Trans-Resveratrol) »
Defendant: Vitamin Shoppe
Consumers who purchased Reservie Trans-Resveratrol dietary supplement product between January 1, 2011 and June 6, 2016 may be eligible for up to $25 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the ingredients in the products.
×Global Marketing Research Services, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Global Marketing Research Services, Inc.
Consumers who received unauthorized calls from Global Marketing Research Services to their cell phones between August 11, 2010 and December 31, 2014 may be eligible for up to $15 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Global Marketing Research Services, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Global Marketing Research Services, Inc.
Consumers who received unauthorized calls from Global Marketing Research Services to their cell phones between August 11, 2010 and December 31, 2014 may be eligible for up to $15 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×US Coachways (TCPA) »
Defendant: US Coachways, Inc.
Consumers who received unauthorized advertising text messages from US Coachways, Inc. four years prior to the filing of the class action through the date of the settlement may be eligible for a pro rata share of the settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone… Read More »
US Coachways (TCPA) »
Defendant: US Coachways, Inc.
Consumers who received unauthorized advertising text messages from US Coachways, Inc. four years prior to the filing of the class action through the date of the settlement may be eligible for a pro rata share of the settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Final Approval Hearing is Nov. 9, 2016.
×iHeartMedia (Text Messages) »
Defendant: iHeartMedia
Consumers who received unauthorized advertising text messages from iHeartMedia between October 16, 2013 and April 19, 2016 may be eligible for a share of the $8.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
iHeartMedia (Text Messages) »
Defendant: iHeartMedia
Consumers who received unauthorized advertising text messages from iHeartMedia between October 16, 2013 and April 19, 2016 may be eligible for a share of the $8.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×NFL and Reebok (Apparel) »
Defendant: NFL and Reebok
California consumers who bought a NFL licensed jersey, hat, or shoes between October 25, 2008 and April 1, 2012 may be eligible for a share of the $4.75 million settlement. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of unfair competition. Read More »
NFL and Reebok (Apparel) »
Defendant: NFL and Reebok
California consumers who bought a NFL licensed jersey, hat, or shoes between October 25, 2008 and April 1, 2012 may be eligible for a share of the $4.75 million settlement. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of unfair competition.
×Equifax (FCRA) »
Defendant: Equifax
Alleges that Equifax failed to identify the public records source in the consumers’ credit file disclosures in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who requested a copy of their credit file disclosures containing public records from Equifax between July 28, 2013 and April 14, 2016 may be eligible… Read More »
Equifax (FCRA) »
Defendant: Equifax
Alleges that Equifax failed to identify the public records source in the consumers’ credit file disclosures in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who requested a copy of their credit file disclosures containing public records from Equifax between July 28, 2013 and April 14, 2016 may be eligible for up 18 months of free Equifax credit monitoring service. Class members will automatically receive the service.
Final Approval Hearing is Oct. 28, 2016.
×