![](https://www.consumer-action.org/images/Impact-Class-Actions.png)
Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Pure Health LLC and Genesis Today (Green Coffee Bean Supplements) »
Defendant: Pure Health LLC and Genesis Today
Pure Health LLC and Genesis Today will provide $9 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding the companies’ deceptive claims that the green coffee bean supplements could cause 17 pounds weight loss in 12 weeks without diet or exercise. Read More »
Pure Health LLC and Genesis Today (Green Coffee Bean Supplements) »
Defendant: Pure Health LLC and Genesis Today
Source: http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2015/01/marketer-who-promoted-green-coffee-bean-weight-loss-supplement
Pure Health LLC and Genesis Today will provide $9 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding the companies’ deceptive claims that the green coffee bean supplements could cause 17 pounds weight loss in 12 weeks without diet or exercise.
×American Express (Interest Rate) »
Defendant: American Express Centurion Bank, American Express Bank
Cardholders whose fixed annual percentage rate was increased or changed to variable interest rate between October 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010 may be eligible for approximately $32.50. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of failing to make disclosures required by Truth in Lending Act and California’s Unfair Competition… Read More »
American Express (Interest Rate) »
Defendant: American Express Centurion Bank, American Express Bank
Cardholders whose fixed annual percentage rate was increased or changed to variable interest rate between October 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010 may be eligible for approximately $32.50. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of failing to make disclosures required by Truth in Lending Act and California’s Unfair Competition Law.
×UniRush, LLC (RushCard) »
Defendant: UniRush, LLC
Cardholders with an open RushCard account between July 14, 2015 and October 12, 2015 and were unable to access their account between October 12, 2015 and October 31, 2015 may be eligible for up to $500 cash and reimbursement of fees. Read More »
UniRush, LLC (RushCard) »
Defendant: UniRush, LLC
Cardholders with an open RushCard account between July 14, 2015 and October 12, 2015 and were unable to access their account between October 12, 2015 and October 31, 2015 may be eligible for up to $500 cash and reimbursement of fees.
×DAP Products Inc. (XHose) »
Defendant: DAP Products Inc.
Consumers who bought certain XHose products between January 1, 2012 and December 29, 2015 may be eligible for up to $45 cash and extended warranty. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false and misleading advertising and product defects. Read More »
DAP Products Inc. (XHose) »
Defendant: DAP Products Inc.
Consumers who bought certain XHose products between January 1, 2012 and December 29, 2015 may be eligible for up to $45 cash and extended warranty. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false and misleading advertising and product defects.
×Homeward Residential/American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Homeward Residential (previous name American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.)
Homeward Residential, formerly called American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Homeward Residential forced Florida property owners to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance. The mortgage servicer received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies… Read More »
Homeward Residential/American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Homeward Residential (previous name American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.)
Homeward Residential, formerly called American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Homeward Residential forced Florida property owners to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance. The mortgage servicer received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Florida borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance premiums issued by certain insurance companies between July 1, 2008 and March 31, 2013 may be eligible to receive back up to 12.5% of the premium.
×Norcold, Inc. (Gas Absorption Refrigerators) »
Defendant: Norcold, Inc.
Alleges certain Norcold 1200 Series, N8 Series and N6 Series Gas Absorption Refrigerators have a defect in the cooling unit, causing the boiler tubes to corrode and leak flammable gas. Consumers who own Norcold 1200 Series that was manufactured between January 1, 2002 and October 1, 2012 may be eligible… Read More »
Norcold, Inc. (Gas Absorption Refrigerators) »
Defendant: Norcold, Inc.
Alleges certain Norcold 1200 Series, N8 Series and N6 Series Gas Absorption Refrigerators have a defect in the cooling unit, causing the boiler tubes to corrode and leak flammable gas. Consumers who own Norcold 1200 Series that was manufactured between January 1, 2002 and October 1, 2012 may be eligible for a share of the $36 million settlement. Consumers who own Norcold N8 Series and N6 Series that were manufactured between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $36 million settlement and three-year extended warranty.
×Ford (Spark Plugs) »
Defendant: Ford
The lawsuit alleges that the two piece spark plugs in the 5.4-liter 3-vlave engine of certain 2004-2008 Ford vehicles are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses. For spark plug replacements performed before the consumer received the class action notice,… Read More »
Ford (Spark Plugs) »
Defendant: Ford
The lawsuit alleges that the two piece spark plugs in the 5.4-liter 3-vlave engine of certain 2004-2008 Ford vehicles are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses. For spark plug replacements performed before the consumer received the class action notice, the claims deadline is Aug. 25, 2016. For spark plug replacements performed after the consumer received the class action notice, the claims deadline is Feb. 27, 2017.
×MultiCare (TCPA) »
Defendant: MultiCare Health System
Consumers who signed MultiCare’s Financial Agreement and Conditions of Treatment forms and received prerecorded calls on their cell phones from Hunter Donaldson on or after July 7, 2010 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations… Read More »
MultiCare (TCPA) »
Defendant: MultiCare Health System
Consumers who signed MultiCare’s Financial Agreement and Conditions of Treatment forms and received prerecorded calls on their cell phones from Hunter Donaldson on or after July 7, 2010 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Nissan (Delta Stroke Sensor) »
Defendant: Nissan
Alleges that Delta Stroke Sensor in the brake booster of certain 2004-2008 model years Nissan Titan, Nissan Armada, and Infiniti QX56 are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may eligible for up to $800 in reimbursement. Read More »
Nissan (Delta Stroke Sensor) »
Defendant: Nissan
Alleges that Delta Stroke Sensor in the brake booster of certain 2004-2008 model years Nissan Titan, Nissan Armada, and Infiniti QX56 are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may eligible for up to $800 in reimbursement.
×Wyndham Hotels (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Wyndham Hotels
California residents who called one or more toll-free numbers to Wyndham Rewards, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Wyndham Grand Hotels and Resorts, Wyndham Garden Hotels, Travelodge, Ramada, Knights Inn, Wingate, Days Inn, Super 8, Baymont, Hawthorn, Microtel, or Tryp between May 1, 2011 and March 23, 2012 and was not informed… Read More »
Wyndham Hotels (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Wyndham Hotels
California residents who called one or more toll-free numbers to Wyndham Rewards, Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Wyndham Grand Hotels and Resorts, Wyndham Garden Hotels, Travelodge, Ramada, Knights Inn, Wingate, Days Inn, Super 8, Baymont, Hawthorn, Microtel, or Tryp between May 1, 2011 and March 23, 2012 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of recording telephone calls without notice or consent of California residents.
×United Recovery Systems, LP (FDCPA) »
Defendant: United Recovery Systems, LP
Residents in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and U.S. Virgin Islands who received a debt collection letter from United Recovery Systems that showed the account number through the window of the envelope between December 4, 2013 and May 22, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $500,000… Read More »
United Recovery Systems, LP (FDCPA) »
Defendant: United Recovery Systems, LP
Residents in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and U.S. Virgin Islands who received a debt collection letter from United Recovery Systems that showed the account number through the window of the envelope between December 4, 2013 and May 22, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $500,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
×Birchbox (Auto Renewal) »
Defendant: Birchbox
California consumers who bought a Birchbox Women’s subscription that automatically renewed between January 1, 2011 and March 6, 2015 may be eligible for two $5 Birchbox credits. California consumers who bought a Birchbox Men’s subscription that automatically renewed between January 1, 2011 and March 6, 2015 may be eligible for… Read More »
Birchbox (Auto Renewal) »
Defendant: Birchbox
California consumers who bought a Birchbox Women’s subscription that automatically renewed between January 1, 2011 and March 6, 2015 may be eligible for two $5 Birchbox credits. California consumers who bought a Birchbox Men’s subscription that automatically renewed between January 1, 2011 and March 6, 2015 may be eligible for two $10 Birchbox credits. Class members will automatically receive credits.
Final Approval Hearing is Sep. 22, 2016.
×Super Mex Restaurants (FACTA) »
Defendant: Super Mex Restaurants
California consumers who conducted credit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit card between May 2, 2012 and April 7, 2014 at the Super Mex restaurants may be eligible for a $50 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations… Read More »
Super Mex Restaurants (FACTA) »
Defendant: Super Mex Restaurants
California consumers who conducted credit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit card between May 2, 2012 and April 7, 2014 at the Super Mex restaurants may be eligible for a $50 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
×Omaha Steaks (TCPA) »
Defendant: Omaha Steaks
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Omaha Steaks between December 9, 2009 and December 17, 2013 may be eligible for either a maximum of $60 cash or $80 reward card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Omaha Steaks (TCPA) »
Defendant: Omaha Steaks
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Omaha Steaks between December 9, 2009 and December 17, 2013 may be eligible for either a maximum of $60 cash or $80 reward card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×US Bank (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: US Bank
US Bank agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that US Bank forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance. The bank received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance… Read More »
US Bank (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: US Bank
US Bank agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that US Bank forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance. The bank received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance premiums issued by certain insurance companies between April 8, 2009 and June 30, 2015 may be eligible to receive back up to 12.5% of the premium.
×