Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Kohl’s (Pricing) »
Defendant: Kohl's
California consumers who bought products advertised at 30% discount or more from the regular price at Kohl’s between June 11, 2011 and April 11, 2016 may be eligible for Kohl’s gift card credit. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false advertising and unfair competition. Read More »
Kohl’s (Pricing) »
Defendant: Kohl's
California consumers who bought products advertised at 30% discount or more from the regular price at Kohl’s between June 11, 2011 and April 11, 2016 may be eligible for Kohl’s gift card credit. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false advertising and unfair competition.
×HireRight (FCRA) »
Defendant: HireRight
The lawsuit alleges that HireRight failed to provide complete consumers’ files when requested in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who requested a copy of their full file from HireRight between May 23, 2008 and May 2, 2016 may be eligible for up to $200 cash. Read More »
HireRight (FCRA) »
Defendant: HireRight
The lawsuit alleges that HireRight failed to provide complete consumers’ files when requested in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who requested a copy of their full file from HireRight between May 23, 2008 and May 2, 2016 may be eligible for up to $200 cash.
×Lumosity (“Brain Training”) »
Defendant: Lumosity
Lumosity will provide $2 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding the Lumosity’s deceptive advertisement of its brain-training program. According to the FTC complaint, Lumosity’s claims that its programs protected against cognitive decline were not supported by science. Consumers who paid at least $239 and subscribed… Read More »
Lumosity (“Brain Training”) »
Defendant: Lumosity
Lumosity will provide $2 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding the Lumosity’s deceptive advertisement of its brain-training program. According to the FTC complaint, Lumosity’s claims that its programs protected against cognitive decline were not supported by science. Consumers who paid at least $239 and subscribed to Lumosity between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014 may be eligible for a refund.
×Gogo (Inflight Internet Service) »
Defendant: Gogo
The lawsuit alleges that Gogo improperly enrolled and charged consumers monthly for the inflight internet service. Consumers who subscribed to Gogo Monthly Pass and only used one month of service between April 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012 may be eligible for up to 6 One-Day Passes. Consumers who subscribed… Read More »
Gogo (Inflight Internet Service) »
Defendant: Gogo
The lawsuit alleges that Gogo improperly enrolled and charged consumers monthly for the inflight internet service. Consumers who subscribed to Gogo Monthly Pass and only used one month of service between April 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012 may be eligible for up to 6 One-Day Passes. Consumers who subscribed to Gogo Monthly Pass and only used one month of service between January 1, 2013 and March 31, 2015 may be eligible for 1 One-Hour Pass. ×Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. (“SPS”) agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that SPS forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance. The lender received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced… Read More »
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. (“SPS”) agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that SPS forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance. The lender received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance premiums issued by certain insurance companies between July 11, 2010 and October 15, 2015 may be eligible to receive back up to 12.5% of the premium.
×Good Karma Foods, Inc. (Flax Milk) »
Defendant: Good Karma Foods, Inc.
California consumers who bought certain Flax Milk products between October 20, 2010 and May 30, 2015 may be eligible for cash reimbursement of 10 cartons maximum. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when some of the ingredients were artificial or synthetic.… Read More »
Good Karma Foods, Inc. (Flax Milk) »
Defendant: Good Karma Foods, Inc.
California consumers who bought certain Flax Milk products between October 20, 2010 and May 30, 2015 may be eligible for cash reimbursement of 10 cartons maximum. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when some of the ingredients were artificial or synthetic.
×Mitsubishi (LaserVue TV) »
Defendant: Mitsubishi
Alleges that the optical engine certain Mitsubishi LaserVue DLP TV models are defective, causing the displays to show video or color anomalies. Consumers who purchased certain Mitsubishi LaserVue DLP TV models between January 1, 2008 and July 13, 2015 may be eligible for free repair, or payment, or reimbursement of… Read More »
Mitsubishi (LaserVue TV) »
Defendant: Mitsubishi
Alleges that the optical engine certain Mitsubishi LaserVue DLP TV models are defective, causing the displays to show video or color anomalies. Consumers who purchased certain Mitsubishi LaserVue DLP TV models between January 1, 2008 and July 13, 2015 may be eligible for free repair, or payment, or reimbursement of out-of-pocket repair costs. The Warranty Service Claim Deadline is within 4 years of the date you purchased your TV or January 25, 2017, whichever is later.
×VCI (Repossession) »
Defendant: VW Credit, Inc.
California residents who leased a motor vehicle from VCI between August 23, 2009 and August 29, 2012 and received a “Notice After Repossession or Voluntary Surrender” with insufficient language may be eligible for a refund of any deficiency balance paid to VCI. Class members will automatically be included in the… Read More »
VCI (Repossession) »
Defendant: VW Credit, Inc.
California residents who leased a motor vehicle from VCI between August 23, 2009 and August 29, 2012 and received a “Notice After Repossession or Voluntary Surrender” with insufficient language may be eligible for a refund of any deficiency balance paid to VCI. Class members will automatically be included in the settlement if they do not exclude themselves. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to comply with California’s Vehicle Leasing Act. Final Approval Hearing is Sep. 2, 2016.
×Rodale Publication (Magazine Subscription) »
Defendant: Rodale Publication
Michigan residents who bought a magazine subscription to a Rodale Publication from July 1, 2009 and May 3, 2016 may be eligible for a pro-rata share of the $4.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of disclosing subscriber’s information to third parties in violation of Michigan’s Video… Read More »
Rodale Publication (Magazine Subscription) »
Defendant: Rodale Publication
Michigan residents who bought a magazine subscription to a Rodale Publication from July 1, 2009 and May 3, 2016 may be eligible for a pro-rata share of the $4.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of disclosing subscriber’s information to third parties in violation of Michigan’s Video Rental Privacy Act.
Final Approval Hearing is Sept. 7, 2016.
×Shop-Vac Corporation and Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC (Shop-Vac) »
Defendant: Shop-Vac Corporation and Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC
Consumers who bought or were gifted certain Shop-Vac vacuum from January 1, 2006 and May 26, 2016 may be eligible for extended manufacturer’s warranty. Class members will automatically receive the warranty extension. Final Approval Hearing is September 15, 2016. Read More »
Shop-Vac Corporation and Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC (Shop-Vac) »
Defendant: Shop-Vac Corporation and Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC
Consumers who bought or were gifted certain Shop-Vac vacuum from January 1, 2006 and May 26, 2016 may be eligible for extended manufacturer’s warranty. Class members will automatically receive the warranty extension. Final Approval Hearing is September 15, 2016.
×Coinstar (Gift Card) »
Defendant: Coinstar
Washington residents who bought a gift card from a kiosk between January 21, 2010 and April 19, 2016 and were unable to redeem their gift card due to illegible code may be eligible for up to $25 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of Washington’s Gift… Read More »
Coinstar (Gift Card) »
Defendant: Coinstar
Washington residents who bought a gift card from a kiosk between January 21, 2010 and April 19, 2016 and were unable to redeem their gift card due to illegible code may be eligible for up to $25 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of Washington’s Gift Card Act and Consumer Protection Act.
×BancorpSouth Bank (Overdraft Fee) »
Defendant: BancorpSouth Bank
Current and former account holders may be eligible for a share of the $24 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between May 18, 2004 and August 13, 2010 on transactions that had sufficient funds available to cover the initial authorization. Class members will automatically receive payment or account… Read More »
BancorpSouth Bank (Overdraft Fee) »
Defendant: BancorpSouth Bank
Current and former account holders may be eligible for a share of the $24 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between May 18, 2004 and August 13, 2010 on transactions that had sufficient funds available to cover the initial authorization. Class members will automatically receive payment or account credit.
Final Approval granted on Jul. 15, 2016. Settlement distributed on Oct. 21, 2016.
×Rita’s Water Ice (TCPA) »
Defendant: Rita’s Water Ice Franchise Company LLC
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from Rita’s between June 22, 2011 and September 15, 2015 may be eligible for a share of the $3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Rita’s Water Ice (TCPA) »
Defendant: Rita’s Water Ice Franchise Company LLC
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from Rita’s between June 22, 2011 and September 15, 2015 may be eligible for a share of the $3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Avis Budget (Frequent Traveler Program Surcharge) »
Defendant: Avis Budget Group, LLC Inc.
Avis Preferred Service Program members who paid a Frequent Traveler Program (“FTP”) Surcharge for receiving frequent-flyer miles between July 14, 2005 and June 14, 2012 may be eligible for a 10% discount off the standard Avis RAC rate or a cash payment. Budget Rapid Rez With Fastbreak Program members who… Read More »
Avis Budget (Frequent Traveler Program Surcharge) »
Defendant: Avis Budget Group, LLC Inc.
Avis Preferred Service Program members who paid a Frequent Traveler Program (“FTP”) Surcharge for receiving frequent-flyer miles between July 14, 2005 and June 14, 2012 may be eligible for a 10% discount off the standard Avis RAC rate or a cash payment. Budget Rapid Rez With Fastbreak Program members who paid a FTP Surcharge for receiving frequent-flyer miles between November 27, 2006 and February 17, 2013 may be eligible for a 10% discount off the standard Budget RAC rate or a cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of breaching the vehicle rental agreements by charging a FTP surcharge.
×Synder’s-Lance (“All Natural”) »
Defendant: Synder’s-Lance
Consumers purchased Synder’s-Lance products between November 13, 2007 and March 3, 2016 may be eligible for up to $20 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “natural,” “all natural,” or “100% natural” when not all the ingredients were natural. Read More »
Synder’s-Lance (“All Natural”) »
Defendant: Synder’s-Lance
Consumers purchased Synder’s-Lance products between November 13, 2007 and March 3, 2016 may be eligible for up to $20 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “natural,” “all natural,” or “100% natural” when not all the ingredients were natural.
×