Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Meredith Publication (Magazine Subscriptions) »
Defendant: Meredith Publication
Michigan residents who bought a magazine subscription to a Meredith Publication from January 1, 2009 and March 28, 2014 may be eligible for a pro-rata share of the $7.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of disclosing subscriber’s information to third parties in violation of Michigan’s Video… Read More »
Meredith Publication (Magazine Subscriptions) »
Defendant: Meredith Publication
Michigan residents who bought a magazine subscription to a Meredith Publication from January 1, 2009 and March 28, 2014 may be eligible for a pro-rata share of the $7.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of disclosing subscriber’s information to third parties in violation of Michigan’s Video Rental Privacy Act.
×JCPenney (Pricing) »
Defendant: JCPenney
California consumers who bought JCPenney private or exclusive brand products advertised at 30% discount or more from the regular price between November 5, 2010 and January 31, 2012 or between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014 may be eligible for cash payment or JCPenney store credit. The company reached… Read More »
JCPenney (Pricing) »
Defendant: JCPenney
California consumers who bought JCPenney private or exclusive brand products advertised at 30% discount or more from the regular price between November 5, 2010 and January 31, 2012 or between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014 may be eligible for cash payment or JCPenney store credit. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false advertising and unfair competition.
×Citibank (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Citibank
California residents who made one or more telephone calls to 800-745-7534 between April 3, 2013 and May 15, 2013 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for payment in the range between $350 and $2,500. The company reached a settlement over allegations… Read More »
Citibank (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Citibank
California residents who made one or more telephone calls to 800-745-7534 between April 3, 2013 and May 15, 2013 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for payment in the range between $350 and $2,500. The company reached a settlement over allegations of recording telephone calls without notice or consent of California residents.
×Whirlpool (Dishwasher) »
Defendant: Whirlpool; Sears
Alleges that certain 2000-2006 Whirlpool, KitchenAid, and Kenmore dishwasher models with electronic control board (“ECB”) are defective, causing ECB to overheat and stop working. Consumers who purchased or were gifted with dishwashers that were manufactured between October 2000 and January 2006 and the dishwashers overheated or overheat in the future… Read More »
Whirlpool (Dishwasher) »
Defendant: Whirlpool; Sears
Alleges that certain 2000-2006 Whirlpool, KitchenAid, and Kenmore dishwasher models with electronic control board (“ECB”) are defective, causing ECB to overheat and stop working. Consumers who purchased or were gifted with dishwashers that were manufactured between October 2000 and January 2006 and the dishwashers overheated or overheat in the future may be eligible for one of the following: full reimbursement for cost of repair; or $300 for replacement; or $100 cash; or 30% rebate of a new Whirlpool dishwasher.
×Westlake Financial Services, LLC (TCPA) »
Defendant: Westlake Financial Services, LLC
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Westlake regarding a loan applicant’s references between January 11, 2012 and November 7, 2013 may be eligible for up to $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Westlake Financial Services, LLC (TCPA) »
Defendant: Westlake Financial Services, LLC
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Westlake regarding a loan applicant’s references between January 11, 2012 and November 7, 2013 may be eligible for up to $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Spirit Airlines (FACTA) »
Defendant: Spirit Airlines
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received a printed receipt that contained more than five digits of the consumer’s credit or debit card between August 29, 2012 and October 28, 2015 may be eligible for around $265. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »
Spirit Airlines (FACTA) »
Defendant: Spirit Airlines
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received a printed receipt that contained more than five digits of the consumer’s credit or debit card between August 29, 2012 and October 28, 2015 may be eligible for around $265. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
×PNC Bank (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: PNC Bank
PNC Bank agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that PNC Bank forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance (“LPI Policy”). The bank received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced… Read More »
PNC Bank (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: PNC Bank
PNC Bank agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that PNC Bank forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance (“LPI Policy”). The bank received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance premiums issued by certain insurance companies between January 1, 2008 and September 30, 2015 may be eligible to receive back 12.5% of the net premium.
×Cumberland (Stevia in the Raw) »
Defendant: Cumberland Packing Corp.
Consumers who bought Stevia in the Raw product between October 9, 2009 and July 1, 2014 may be eligible for up to $16 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “natural,” “all natural,” or “100% natural” when not all the ingredients were natural. Read More »
Cumberland (Stevia in the Raw) »
Defendant: Cumberland Packing Corp.
Consumers who bought Stevia in the Raw product between October 9, 2009 and July 1, 2014 may be eligible for up to $16 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “natural,” “all natural,” or “100% natural” when not all the ingredients were natural. ×HSBC (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: HSBC
Consumers may be eligible for a share of the $30 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between December 17, 2004 and June 30, 2010 due to HSBC’s practice of reordering transactions. Consumers who were charged one or more overdraft fees after June 30, 2007 due to HSBC’s practice… Read More »
HSBC (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: HSBC
Consumers may be eligible for a share of the $30 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between December 17, 2004 and June 30, 2010 due to HSBC’s practice of reordering transactions. Consumers who were charged one or more overdraft fees after June 30, 2007 due to HSBC’s practice of reordering transactions will automatically receive payment or account credit. Consumers who were charged one or more overdraft fees between December 17, 2004 and June 30, 2007 must file a claim to receive payment or account credit. ×Carrier iQ (Consumer Privacy) »
Defendant: Carrier iQ
Consumers who bought certain mobile devices that were equipped with Carrier iQ software between December 1, 2007 and March 1, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $9 million settlement. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of violations of privacy and wiretap laws. Read More »
Carrier iQ (Consumer Privacy) »
Defendant: Carrier iQ
Consumers who bought certain mobile devices that were equipped with Carrier iQ software between December 1, 2007 and March 1, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $9 million settlement. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of violations of privacy and wiretap laws.
×BMW (i3 REx Range Extender) »
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC and BMW AG
Alleges that certain BMW 2014-2016 i3 REx model electric cars are defective, causing the vehicle to lose speed and power mid-drive without warning. The case is Rollolazo v. BMW of North America, LLC and BMW AG, Case No. 8:16-cv-00966, in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California Southern Division.… Read More »
BMW (i3 REx Range Extender) »
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC and BMW AG
Alleges that certain BMW 2014-2016 i3 REx model electric cars are defective, causing the vehicle to lose speed and power mid-drive without warning. The case is Rollolazo v. BMW of North America, LLC and BMW AG, Case No. 8:16-cv-00966, in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California Southern Division.
×Family Dollar (TCPA) »
Defendant: Family Dollar
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from Family Dollar between October 16, 2013 and March 7, 2016 may be eligible for up to $300 cash and up to $200 Family Dollar gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Family Dollar (TCPA) »
Defendant: Family Dollar
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from Family Dollar between October 16, 2013 and March 7, 2016 may be eligible for up to $300 cash and up to $200 Family Dollar gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Wells Fargo (Genuine Title) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo; Genuine Title
Mortgage borrowers whose loans were closed by Genuine Title between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014 may be eligible to receive back a certain percentage of amounts paid to Genuine Title. Wells Fargo reached a settlement over allegations of Genuine Title paying unlawful benefits to certain Wells Fargo employees… Read More »
Wells Fargo (Genuine Title) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo; Genuine Title
Mortgage borrowers whose loans were closed by Genuine Title between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014 may be eligible to receive back a certain percentage of amounts paid to Genuine Title. Wells Fargo reached a settlement over allegations of Genuine Title paying unlawful benefits to certain Wells Fargo employees in exchange of referrals to Genuine Title.
×AG Adriano Goldschmied Inc. and Nordstrom (“Made in USA”) »
Defendant: AG Adriano Goldschmied Inc. and Nordstrom
Consumers who bought AG Adriano Goldschmied Inc. (“AGAG”) product between June 4, 2010 and February 29, 2016 with the label “Made in USA” when there were some parts that were not made in USA may be eligible for one $20 AGAG promo code per qualifying product or one free AGAG… Read More »
AG Adriano Goldschmied Inc. and Nordstrom (“Made in USA”) »
Defendant: AG Adriano Goldschmied Inc. and Nordstrom
Consumers who bought AG Adriano Goldschmied Inc. (“AGAG”) product between June 4, 2010 and February 29, 2016 with the label “Made in USA” when there were some parts that were not made in USA may be eligible for one $20 AGAG promo code per qualifying product or one free AGAG pants per qualifying product. The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling and advertising the product as “Made in USA” when it contained some foreign made parts.
×Abercrombie & Fitch (TPCA) »
Defendant: Abercrombie & Fitch
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from Hollister Co., and/or Abercrombie & Fitch Co., between August 25, 2010 and December 18, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $10 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Abercrombie & Fitch (TPCA) »
Defendant: Abercrombie & Fitch
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from Hollister Co., and/or Abercrombie & Fitch Co., between August 25, 2010 and December 18, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $10 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. ×