Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Strategic Screening Solutions, Inc. (FCRA) »
Defendant: Strategic Screening Solutions, Inc.
The lawsuit alleges that Strategic Screening Solutions reported criminal records without notice to the consumer and reported inaccurate criminal information in background checks to employers in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who were subject to a background check for employment purposes between November 26, 2012 and June… Read More »
Strategic Screening Solutions, Inc. (FCRA) »
Defendant: Strategic Screening Solutions, Inc.
The lawsuit alleges that Strategic Screening Solutions reported criminal records without notice to the consumer and reported inaccurate criminal information in background checks to employers in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who were subject to a background check for employment purposes between November 26, 2012 and June 1, 2015 that contained an adverse public record and did not receive written notice would automatically receive $41 cash. Individuals who were subject to a background check for employment purposes between November 26, 2012 and June 1, 2015 that contained an adverse public record with information beyond seven years and did not receive written notice may be eligible for an additional payment.
×Earth (Exer-Walk Shoe) »
Defendant: Earth, Inc.
Consumers who bought an Earth Exer-Walk shoe from January 1, 2009 to October 14, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of mislabeling the product with health benefits such as “improve posture,” “reduce joint stress,” “strengthen core muscles,”… Read More »
Earth (Exer-Walk Shoe) »
Defendant: Earth, Inc.
Consumers who bought an Earth Exer-Walk shoe from January 1, 2009 to October 14, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of mislabeling the product with health benefits such as “improve posture,” “reduce joint stress,” “strengthen core muscles,” and “burn calories” when the health benefits were not realized. ×Bluestem (Fingerhut and Gettington and PayCheck Direct) »
Defendant: Bluestem
Consumers who received automated call regarding a credit account debt between September 11, 2009 and November 15, 2014 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $4.4 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Bluestem (Fingerhut and Gettington and PayCheck Direct) »
Defendant: Bluestem
Consumers who received automated call regarding a credit account debt between September 11, 2009 and November 15, 2014 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $4.4 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. ×Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. (BANA) »
Defendant: Bank of America; BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Alleges Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Service, L.P. (collectively “BANA”) received property claim insurance funds and withheld such funds from borrowers who were in foreclosure on or before April 11, 2013. Class members must submit the IRS Form W-9 and the claim form by May 10, 2016 to… Read More »
Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. (BANA) »
Defendant: Bank of America; BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Alleges Bank of America and BAC Home Loans Service, L.P. (collectively “BANA”) received property claim insurance funds and withheld such funds from borrowers who were in foreclosure on or before April 11, 2013. Class members must submit the IRS Form W-9 and the claim form by May 10, 2016 to be eligible to receive a pro rata share to the $1 million settlement.
×Tom’s of Maine Inc. (“Natural”) »
Defendant: Tom’s of Maine Inc.
Consumers who purchased certain Tom’s of Maine products between March 25, 2009 and September 23, 2015 may be eligible for up to $28 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all of the ingredients were natural. Read More »
Tom’s of Maine Inc. (“Natural”) »
Defendant: Tom’s of Maine Inc.
Consumers who purchased certain Tom’s of Maine products between March 25, 2009 and September 23, 2015 may be eligible for up to $28 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all of the ingredients were natural.
×Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. (FDCPA) »
Defendant: Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Consumers who received automatic withdrawal authorization form between February 17, 2014 and December 4, 2015 may be eligible for payment in the range between $17 and $50. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Read More »
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. (FDCPA) »
Defendant: Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.
Consumers who received automatic withdrawal authorization form between February 17, 2014 and December 4, 2015 may be eligible for payment in the range between $17 and $50. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
×Verizon (TCPA) »
Defendant: Verizon
Consumers who received calls to their cell phones since June 14, 2008 may be eligible for about $100 cash. California consumers who received calls to their cell phones since September 10, 2010 may be eligible for about $100 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone… Read More »
Verizon (TCPA) »
Defendant: Verizon
Consumers who received calls to their cell phones since June 14, 2008 may be eligible for about $100 cash. California consumers who received calls to their cell phones since September 10, 2010 may be eligible for about $100 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and California Invasion of Privacy Act.
×International Marketplace (FACTA) »
Defendant: International Marketplace
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that contained the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card or the last five digits of their card number between December 31, 2012 and December 13, 2014 may be eligible for a $50 gift card.… Read More »
International Marketplace (FACTA) »
Defendant: International Marketplace
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that contained the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card or the last five digits of their card number between December 31, 2012 and December 13, 2014 may be eligible for a $50 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act. ×Ocwen (Misdated Letter) »
Defendant: Ocwen
Borrowers who receive incorrectly dated letter between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014 with a deadline and referred to foreclosure may be eligible for up to $3,000. Read More »
Ocwen (Misdated Letter) »
Defendant: Ocwen
Borrowers who receive incorrectly dated letter between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014 with a deadline and referred to foreclosure may be eligible for up to $3,000.
×LifeLock, Inc (ID Theft Protection Plan) »
Defendant: LifeLock, Inc
Consumers enrolled in LifeLock identity theft protection plan between September 1, 2010 and January 20, 2016 may be eligible for up to $20. Consumers enrolled in LifeLock identity theft protection plan between January 1, 2012 and April 30, 2015 may be eligible for up to $39. The company reached a… Read More »
LifeLock, Inc (ID Theft Protection Plan) »
Defendant: LifeLock, Inc
Consumers enrolled in LifeLock identity theft protection plan between September 1, 2010 and January 20, 2016 may be eligible for up to $20. Consumers enrolled in LifeLock identity theft protection plan between January 1, 2012 and April 30, 2015 may be eligible for up to $39. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the scope and effectiveness of the protection plans.
×Everbank (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Everbank
Everbank agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Everbank forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance (“LPI Policy”). The bank received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance… Read More »
Everbank (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Everbank
Everbank agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Everbank forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance (“LPI Policy”). The bank received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance premiums issued by certain insurance companies between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2015 may be eligible to receive back 12.5% of the net premium. Deadline to submit claim form subject to change without prior notice.
×LeadPoint (TCPA) »
Defendant: Lead Info Stream, Inc. and LeadPoint
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Lead Info Stream since May 28, 2010 may be eligible for up to $20 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and California Invasion of Privacy Act. Read More »
LeadPoint (TCPA) »
Defendant: Lead Info Stream, Inc. and LeadPoint
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Lead Info Stream since May 28, 2010 may be eligible for up to $20 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and California Invasion of Privacy Act.
×Gucci (Personal Identification Information) »
Defendant: Gucci
California consumers whose personal identification information was requested and recorded during a credit card transaction between December 8, 2013 and March 16, 2016 at Gucci stores may be eligible to receive either a free gift item pre-selected by Gucci or 15% voucher off any full-priced merchandise purchase at a California… Read More »
Gucci (Personal Identification Information) »
Defendant: Gucci
California consumers whose personal identification information was requested and recorded during a credit card transaction between December 8, 2013 and March 16, 2016 at Gucci stores may be eligible to receive either a free gift item pre-selected by Gucci or 15% voucher off any full-priced merchandise purchase at a California Gucci store. Vouchers were sent to class members in February 2017. The Vouchers expire on August 27, 2017.
×Kmart (ZIP Code) »
Defendant: Kmart
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between January 23, 2010 and January 13, 2016 at Kmart stores in Massachusetts. Class members may be eligible to receive a 15% discount certificate or $10 gift certificate, or $10 Shop Your Way Points. Read More »
Kmart (ZIP Code) »
Defendant: Kmart
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between January 23, 2010 and January 13, 2016 at Kmart stores in Massachusetts. Class members may be eligible to receive a 15% discount certificate or $10 gift certificate, or $10 Shop Your Way Points.
×Blue Buffalo (Pet Foods) »
Defendant: Blue Buffalo
Consumers who bought Blue Buffalo products between May 7, 2008 and December 18, 2015 may be eligible for up to $200. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as free of certain ingredients but contained such ingredients. Read More »
Blue Buffalo (Pet Foods) »
Defendant: Blue Buffalo
Consumers who bought Blue Buffalo products between May 7, 2008 and December 18, 2015 may be eligible for up to $200. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as free of certain ingredients but contained such ingredients. ×