Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Midland Credit (TCPA) »
Defendant: Midland Credit
Consumers who received automated call regarding an alleged debt between November 2, 2006 and August 31, 2014 and does not owe an outstanding debt account may be eligible for a pro rata share of $2 million settlement. Consumers who received automated call regarding an alleged debt between November 2, 2006… Read More »
Midland Credit (TCPA) »
Defendant: Midland Credit
Consumers who received automated call regarding an alleged debt between November 2, 2006 and August 31, 2014 and does not owe an outstanding debt account may be eligible for a pro rata share of $2 million settlement. Consumers who received automated call regarding an alleged debt between November 2, 2006 and August 31, 2014 and does owe a balance on the collection account may be eligible for the lessor of a pro rata share of $13 million debt forgiveness or the balance owed on the collection account. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. ×Nationstar Mortgage (TCPA) »
Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Nationstar Mortgage since October 14, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $12.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Nationstar Mortgage (TCPA) »
Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Nationstar Mortgage since October 14, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $12.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Tween Brands, Inc. and Ascena Retail Group, Inc. (Justice) »
Defendant: Tween Brands, Inc. and Ascena Retail Group, Inc.
Alleges that Justice mislead consumers with “40% off” markdown when the “40% off” amount was actually the regular price of the items. Consumers who bought merchandise from Justice between January 1, 2012 and February 28, 2015 may be eligible for cash award or merchandise voucher. Read More »
Tween Brands, Inc. and Ascena Retail Group, Inc. (Justice) »
Defendant: Tween Brands, Inc. and Ascena Retail Group, Inc.
Alleges that Justice mislead consumers with “40% off” markdown when the “40% off” amount was actually the regular price of the items. Consumers who bought merchandise from Justice between January 1, 2012 and February 28, 2015 may be eligible for cash award or merchandise voucher. ×DSM Nutritional Products (i-Cool for Menopause) »
Defendant: DSM Nutritional Products
California female consumers who purchased i-Cool for Menopause between September 23, 2008 and September 23, 2011 may be eligible for a full refund. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the product as safely reducing hot flashes by up to 85%. Read More »
DSM Nutritional Products (i-Cool for Menopause) »
Defendant: DSM Nutritional Products
California female consumers who purchased i-Cool for Menopause between September 23, 2008 and September 23, 2011 may be eligible for a full refund. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the product as safely reducing hot flashes by up to 85%. ×Farmers Group (Texas Home or Auto Insurance) »
Defendant: Farmers Group
Texas consumers who purchased certain home or automobile insurance policies from Farmers Group between October 1, 1999 and February 28, 2003 may be eligible for premium rate reductions, or compensation based on negotiated discounts, or $35 cash. The lawsuit alleges that the insurance companies failed to provide adequate notice of… Read More »
Farmers Group (Texas Home or Auto Insurance) »
Defendant: Farmers Group
Texas consumers who purchased certain home or automobile insurance policies from Farmers Group between October 1, 1999 and February 28, 2003 may be eligible for premium rate reductions, or compensation based on negotiated discounts, or $35 cash. The lawsuit alleges that the insurance companies failed to provide adequate notice of adverse action based on the policyholder’s credit reports and used unfair or deceptive practices to determine the pricing of insurance policies, resulting in excessive premiums. ×Michael Kors (Outlets) »
Defendant: Michael Kors
Consumers who bought an item with a price tag showing both an “Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price” and “Our Price” at a Michael Kors Outlet Store from July 25, 2010 and July 25, 2015 may be eligible for a share of the $4,875,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations… Read More »
Michael Kors (Outlets) »
Defendant: Michael Kors
Consumers who bought an item with a price tag showing both an “Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price” and “Our Price” at a Michael Kors Outlet Store from July 25, 2010 and July 25, 2015 may be eligible for a share of the $4,875,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleadingly labeling the price of the merchandise.
×Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc.
Consumers who received unsolicited calls from Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc. between June 12, 2010 and January 28, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share for the $4.2 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc.
Consumers who received unsolicited calls from Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc. between June 12, 2010 and January 28, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share for the $4.2 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×JPMorgan Chase (FCRA) »
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase
Alleges that Chase improperly accessed consumer credit reports of former Chase customers after their account relationship with Chase ended. Accountholders whose information was accessed between October 16, 2009 and October 16, 2014 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $8.75 million settlement. Read More »
JPMorgan Chase (FCRA) »
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase
Alleges that Chase improperly accessed consumer credit reports of former Chase customers after their account relationship with Chase ended. Accountholders whose information was accessed between October 16, 2009 and October 16, 2014 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $8.75 million settlement. ×Bank of America (Overdraft Fee) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Current and former account holders may be eligible for a share of the $27.5 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between May 25, 2011 and February 5, 2016 on transactions that had sufficient funds available to cover the initial authorization. Class members will automatically receive payment or account… Read More »
Bank of America (Overdraft Fee) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Current and former account holders may be eligible for a share of the $27.5 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between May 25, 2011 and February 5, 2016 on transactions that had sufficient funds available to cover the initial authorization. Class members will automatically receive payment or account credit.
Final Approval granted on Aug. 4, 2016.
×Wells Fargo (Inspection Fee) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Alleges that Wells Fargo unnecessarily ordered property inspection when a borrower fell behind on mortgage payments by forty-five days or more and continued to order property inspection every twenty-five to thirty-five days for as long as the borrower remained delinquent. Borrowers who owe or paid a property inspection fee assessed… Read More »
Wells Fargo (Inspection Fee) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Alleges that Wells Fargo unnecessarily ordered property inspection when a borrower fell behind on mortgage payments by forty-five days or more and continued to order property inspection every twenty-five to thirty-five days for as long as the borrower remained delinquent. Borrowers who owe or paid a property inspection fee assessed between August 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $25 million settlement.
×Toyota (Corolla) »
Defendant: Toyota
The lawsuit alleges that certain 2009- 2010 Toyota Corolla vehicles (excluding XRS grade) with electric power steering (“EPS”) system are defective since the EPS will suddenly drift or veer during normal use. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for cash reimbursement of costs of repairs or… Read More »
Toyota (Corolla) »
Defendant: Toyota
The lawsuit alleges that certain 2009- 2010 Toyota Corolla vehicles (excluding XRS grade) with electric power steering (“EPS”) system are defective since the EPS will suddenly drift or veer during normal use. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for cash reimbursement of costs of repairs or free or discounted installation repairs. ×Rite Aid (Fixed Records Charge) »
Defendant: Rite Aid
Consumers who paid $50 Fixed Records Charge for customer pharmacy records after January 1, 2005 may be eligible for $15 Rite Aid gift card per $50 charge paid. Consumers who paid $80 Fixed Records Charge for customer pharmacy records after January 1, 2005 may be eligible for $25 Rite Aid… Read More »
Rite Aid (Fixed Records Charge) »
Defendant: Rite Aid
Consumers who paid $50 Fixed Records Charge for customer pharmacy records after January 1, 2005 may be eligible for $15 Rite Aid gift card per $50 charge paid. Consumers who paid $80 Fixed Records Charge for customer pharmacy records after January 1, 2005 may be eligible for $25 Rite Aid gift card per $80 charge paid. The company reached a settlement over allegations of unlawfully charging a fixed fee for pharmacy records regardless of the numbers of pages in the pharmacy record. ×Federal Financial Group (TCPA) »
Defendant: Federal Financial Group
Missouri residents who received automated calls to their Missouri area code cell phones from October 16, 2013 to the present may be eligible for up to $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Federal Financial Group (TCPA) »
Defendant: Federal Financial Group
Missouri residents who received automated calls to their Missouri area code cell phones from October 16, 2013 to the present may be eligible for up to $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. ×T-Mobile Asurion (Cellphone Insurance) »
Defendant: T-Mobile and Asurion
California consumers who bought Asurion cell phone insurance policy through T-Mobile between August 1, 2003 and April 2, 2008 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $4.2 million settlement. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose certain terms of the insurance policy. Read More »
T-Mobile Asurion (Cellphone Insurance) »
Defendant: T-Mobile and Asurion
California consumers who bought Asurion cell phone insurance policy through T-Mobile between August 1, 2003 and April 2, 2008 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $4.2 million settlement. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose certain terms of the insurance policy.
×Symantec (Norton) »
Defendant: Symantec
Consumers who bought Extended Download Service for Norton Products or Norton Download Insurance between January 23, 2005 and March 10, 2011 may be eligible for $50 cash for each service they purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to inform consumers of free alternative methods to redownload… Read More »
Symantec (Norton) »
Defendant: Symantec
Consumers who bought Extended Download Service for Norton Products or Norton Download Insurance between January 23, 2005 and March 10, 2011 may be eligible for $50 cash for each service they purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to inform consumers of free alternative methods to redownload purchase Norton software.
×