Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Public Storage (Insurance) »
Defendant: Public Storage
Alleges that Public Storage sold self-storage insurance policies as from an independent insurance company when the insurance premiums actually went to Public Storage. Florida consumers who rented storage units and purchased self-storage insurance policies through Public Storage between May 1, 2010 and June 18, 2015 may be eligible for up… Read More »
Public Storage (Insurance) »
Defendant: Public Storage
Alleges that Public Storage sold self-storage insurance policies as from an independent insurance company when the insurance premiums actually went to Public Storage. Florida consumers who rented storage units and purchased self-storage insurance policies through Public Storage between May 1, 2010 and June 18, 2015 may be eligible for up to 50% of their alleged damages. ×Groupon (Expiration Date) »
Defendant: Groupon
Alleges that expiration dates and other restrictions on Groupon’s vouchers violate state and federal laws. Residents of certain states who purchased a Groupon voucher between November 1, 2008 and December 1, 2011 and the voucher was never redeemed or refunded may be eligible for Groupon credits equal to 130% of… Read More »
Groupon (Expiration Date) »
Defendant: Groupon
Alleges that expiration dates and other restrictions on Groupon’s vouchers violate state and federal laws. Residents of certain states who purchased a Groupon voucher between November 1, 2008 and December 1, 2011 and the voucher was never redeemed or refunded may be eligible for Groupon credits equal to 130% of the purchase price of the unredeemed or unrefunded Groupon voucher. ×Nike (FuelBand) »
Defendant: Nike
Consumers who bought a Nike+ FuelBand between January 19, 2012 and June 17, 2015 may be eligible for $15 cash or $25 Nike gift card. Nike and Apple reached a settlement over allegations of falsely stating the product’s accuracy and failure to honor the warranty. Read More »
Nike (FuelBand) »
Defendant: Nike
Consumers who bought a Nike+ FuelBand between January 19, 2012 and June 17, 2015 may be eligible for $15 cash or $25 Nike gift card. Nike and Apple reached a settlement over allegations of falsely stating the product’s accuracy and failure to honor the warranty.
×iYogi (TCPA) »
Defendant: iYogi
Current or former iYogi subscribers who received unauthorized calls from iYogi between September 23, 2009 and November 18, 2013 may be eligible for $40 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
iYogi (TCPA) »
Defendant: iYogi
Current or former iYogi subscribers who received unauthorized calls from iYogi between September 23, 2009 and November 18, 2013 may be eligible for $40 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. ×Sprint (Cramming) »
Defendant: Sprint
Sprint agreed to settlement regarding Sprint’s unauthorized third-party charges for premium SMS services such as ringtones, wallpapers, celebrity gossip or horoscopes. Current and former Sprint customers who paid for unauthorized premium SMS after July 1, 2010 may be eligible for a refund of unauthorized Premium SMS charges that were not… Read More »
Sprint (Cramming) »
Defendant: Sprint
Sprint agreed to settlement regarding Sprint’s unauthorized third-party charges for premium SMS services such as ringtones, wallpapers, celebrity gossip or horoscopes. Current and former Sprint customers who paid for unauthorized premium SMS after July 1, 2010 may be eligible for a refund of unauthorized Premium SMS charges that were not reimbursed.
×Verizon Wireless (Cramming) »
Defendant: Verizon Wireless
Verizon Wireless agreed to settlement regarding Verizon’s unauthorized third-party charges for premium SMS services such as ringtones, wallpapers, celebrity gossip or horoscopes. Current and former Verizon customers who paid for unauthorized premium SMS after July 1, 2010 may be eligible for a refund of unauthorized Premium SMS charges that were… Read More »
Verizon Wireless (Cramming) »
Defendant: Verizon Wireless
Verizon Wireless agreed to settlement regarding Verizon’s unauthorized third-party charges for premium SMS services such as ringtones, wallpapers, celebrity gossip or horoscopes. Current and former Verizon customers who paid for unauthorized premium SMS after July 1, 2010 may be eligible for a refund of unauthorized Premium SMS charges that were not reimbursed.
×Elations (Joint Supplement) »
Defendant: The Elations Company, LLC
California consumers who bought certain Elations joint supplement products between May 28, 2009 and August 31, 2015 may be eligible for up to $18. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising that the product has “clinically-proven formula” for joint comfort when they do not provide these benefits. Read More »
Elations (Joint Supplement) »
Defendant: The Elations Company, LLC
California consumers who bought certain Elations joint supplement products between May 28, 2009 and August 31, 2015 may be eligible for up to $18. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising that the product has “clinically-proven formula” for joint comfort when they do not provide these benefits. ×Macy’s or Bloomingdale’s (TCPA) »
Defendant: Department Stores National Bank and FDS Bank
Consumers who received an automated call regarding a debt on a Macy’s or Bloomingdale’s credit card account between September 3, 2009 and July 22, 2015 may be eligible for up to $750. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Macy’s or Bloomingdale’s (TCPA) »
Defendant: Department Stores National Bank and FDS Bank
Consumers who received an automated call regarding a debt on a Macy’s or Bloomingdale’s credit card account between September 3, 2009 and July 22, 2015 may be eligible for up to $750. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Asset Acceptance, LLC (TCPA) »
Defendant: Asset Acceptance, LLC
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Assets Acceptance, LLC or someone action on behalf of Asset Acceptance, LLC between April 17, 2009 and September 4, 2014 and does not owe money to Assets Acceptance, LLC may be eligible for up to $1,500. Consumers who received automated… Read More »
Asset Acceptance, LLC (TCPA) »
Defendant: Asset Acceptance, LLC
Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Assets Acceptance, LLC or someone action on behalf of Asset Acceptance, LLC between April 17, 2009 and September 4, 2014 and does not owe money to Assets Acceptance, LLC may be eligible for up to $1,500. Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Assets Acceptance, LLC or someone action on behalf of Asset Acceptance, LLC between April 17, 2009 and September 4, 2014 and does owe money to Asset Acceptance, LLC may be eligible for debt reduction up to $1,500. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×One Technologies (“Free” Credit Scores) »
Defendant: One Technologies
Consumers who were charged for MyCreditHealth or ScoreSense credit monitoring may be eligible for a refund. One Technologies will provide $22 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding One Technologies deceptive advertisement of free credit scores. According to the FTC complaint, One Technologies did not… Read More »
One Technologies (“Free” Credit Scores) »
Defendant: One Technologies
Consumers who were charged for MyCreditHealth or ScoreSense credit monitoring may be eligible for a refund. One Technologies will provide $22 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding One Technologies deceptive advertisement of free credit scores. According to the FTC complaint, One Technologies did not inform consumers that by signing up for a free credit score, the consumers would be enrolled in a credit monitoring program with a monthly fee of $29.95.
×TRS Recovery Services, Inc. (FDCPA) »
Defendant: TRS Recovery Services, Inc. and TeleCheck
Consumers who received a collection letter from TRS Recovery Services between March 11, 2010 and July 30, 2015 may be eligible for a share of the $3.4 million settlement. Maine residents who paid $25 returned check fee to TRS Recovery Services or TeleCheck between March 11, 2010 and July 30,… Read More »
TRS Recovery Services, Inc. (FDCPA) »
Defendant: TRS Recovery Services, Inc. and TeleCheck
Consumers who received a collection letter from TRS Recovery Services between March 11, 2010 and July 30, 2015 may be eligible for a share of the $3.4 million settlement. Maine residents who paid $25 returned check fee to TRS Recovery Services or TeleCheck between March 11, 2010 and July 30, 2015 may be eligible for the $3.4 million settlement. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. ×Frost-Arnett Co. (FDCPA) »
Defendant: Frost-Arnett Company
Residents within the Third Circuit Court of Appeals who received a debt collection letter from Frost-Arnett Company that showed the account number through the window of the envelope since December 19, 2013 may be eligible to receive around $28.23 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »
Frost-Arnett Co. (FDCPA) »
Defendant: Frost-Arnett Company
Residents within the Third Circuit Court of Appeals who received a debt collection letter from Frost-Arnett Company that showed the account number through the window of the envelope since December 19, 2013 may be eligible to receive around $28.23 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. ×The Warranty Group (TCPA) »
Defendant: The Warranty Group, Inc. and American Protection Plans LLC
Consumers who previously called American Residential Warranty’s call center and ended the call before speaking with an operator or leaving a voicemail and subsequently received unauthorized home warranty products promotional calls between March 7, 2011 and August 11, 2015 may be eligible for up to $125. The company reached a… Read More »
The Warranty Group (TCPA) »
Defendant: The Warranty Group, Inc. and American Protection Plans LLC
Consumers who previously called American Residential Warranty’s call center and ended the call before speaking with an operator or leaving a voicemail and subsequently received unauthorized home warranty products promotional calls between March 7, 2011 and August 11, 2015 may be eligible for up to $125. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Van’s (Frozen Breakfast Products) »
Defendant: Van's
Consumers who purchased certain Van’s frozen breakfast products between January 1, 2009 and June 16, 2015 may be eligible for up to $18 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all of the ingredients were natural. Read More »
Van’s (Frozen Breakfast Products) »
Defendant: Van's
Consumers who purchased certain Van’s frozen breakfast products between January 1, 2009 and June 16, 2015 may be eligible for up to $18 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all of the ingredients were natural.
×PVH Corp. (FCRA) »
Defendant: PVH Corp.
The lawsuit alleges that PVH Corp. failed to clearly disclose that the background checks would be obtained for employment purposes in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who applied for employment between April 3, 2010 and April 2, 2013 and had adverse employment action taken against them based… Read More »
PVH Corp. (FCRA) »
Defendant: PVH Corp.
The lawsuit alleges that PVH Corp. failed to clearly disclose that the background checks would be obtained for employment purposes in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who applied for employment between April 3, 2010 and April 2, 2013 and had adverse employment action taken against them based on the background reports may be eligible for $686.98. Individuals who applied for employment between April 3, 2013 and May 11, 2015 and had adverse employment action taken against them based on the background reports may be eligible for $975. Final hearing is on February 11, 2016.
×