Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Ocwen (Force Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Ocwen
Ocwen agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Ocwen forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance (“LPI Policy”). The bank received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance… Read More »
Ocwen (Force Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: Ocwen
Ocwen agreed to a settlement regarding its forced-placed hazard insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Ocwen forced consumers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard insurance (“LPI Policy”). The bank received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for overpriced hazard insurance premiums issued by certain insurance companies between January 1, 2008 and January 23, 2015 may be eligible to receive back 12.5% of the net premium.
×LinkedIn (Add Connections) »
Defendant: LinkedIn
LinkedIn agreed to a $13 million settlement regarding LinkedIn’s Add Connections feature. Add Connections imports contacts from LinkedIn members external email accounts and sends connection invitations. LinkedIn members did not consent to the two reminder emails that used their names and likeness. Current and former LinkedIn members who used Add… Read More »
LinkedIn (Add Connections) »
Defendant: LinkedIn
LinkedIn agreed to a $13 million settlement regarding LinkedIn’s Add Connections feature. Add Connections imports contacts from LinkedIn members external email accounts and sends connection invitations. LinkedIn members did not consent to the two reminder emails that used their names and likeness. Current and former LinkedIn members who used Add Connections between September 17, 2011 and October 31, 2014 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the settlement.
×Six Continents Hotels (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Six Continents Hotels
California residents who received one or more telephone calls from Priority Club Rewards, Holiday Inn, Holiday Inn Express, Crown Plaza Hotels and Resorts, Intercontinental Hotels and Resorts, Staybridge Suites, Candlewood Suites or Hotel Indigo between March 1, 2011 and July 18, 2012 and was not informed that the call may… Read More »
Six Continents Hotels (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Six Continents Hotels
California residents who received one or more telephone calls from Priority Club Rewards, Holiday Inn, Holiday Inn Express, Crown Plaza Hotels and Resorts, Intercontinental Hotels and Resorts, Staybridge Suites, Candlewood Suites or Hotel Indigo between March 1, 2011 and July 18, 2012 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for $100 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of recording telephone calls without notice or consent of California residents.
×Canon (Inkjet Printer) »
Defendant: Canon
Consumers who bought certain models of Canon inkjet printers may be eligible for warranty extension or $50 cash or $75 voucher for use at the online Canon store. The company reached a settlement over allegations of defect in the printer. Read More »
Canon (Inkjet Printer) »
Defendant: Canon
Consumers who bought certain models of Canon inkjet printers may be eligible for warranty extension or $50 cash or $75 voucher for use at the online Canon store. The company reached a settlement over allegations of defect in the printer.
×Cathode Ray Tubes (TVs and Computer Monitors) »
Defendant:
Residents of certain states who purchased a TV or computer monitor containing cathode ray tubes (“CRTs) from March 1, 1995 and November 25, 2007 may be eligible for $25 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of overcharging consumers on products containing CRTs. Read More »
Cathode Ray Tubes (TVs and Computer Monitors) »
Defendant:
Residents of certain states who purchased a TV or computer monitor containing cathode ray tubes (“CRTs) from March 1, 1995 and November 25, 2007 may be eligible for $25 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of overcharging consumers on products containing CRTs.
×MAC (Zip Code) »
Defendant: MAC
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between November 5, 2009 and October 9, 2015 at MAC stores in Massachusetts. Class members may be eligible to receive a gift card for use at a Massachusetts MAC retail store. Final Hearing is Mar.… Read More »
MAC (Zip Code) »
Defendant: MAC
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between November 5, 2009 and October 9, 2015 at MAC stores in Massachusetts. Class members may be eligible to receive a gift card for use at a Massachusetts MAC retail store. Final Hearing is Mar. 1, 2016
×ZeoBIT (MacKeeper Software) »
Defendant: ZeoBIT
Consumers who bought MacKepper Software on or before July 8, 2015 may be eligible for up to $39.95 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the product’s capability to enhance Apple computer’s speed, performance, and security when it does not. Read More »
ZeoBIT (MacKeeper Software) »
Defendant: ZeoBIT
Consumers who bought MacKepper Software on or before July 8, 2015 may be eligible for up to $39.95 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the product’s capability to enhance Apple computer’s speed, performance, and security when it does not.
×Eagle Loan Company of Ohio, Inc. (Interest Rate) »
Defendant: Eagle Loan Company of Ohio, Inc.
Ohio residents who obtained a loan from Eagle Financial Services with an interest rate higher than 21% from August 18, 2008 and August 31, 2015 may be eligible for an estimated $40 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of charging higher interest rate than allowed by Ohio law. Read More »
Eagle Loan Company of Ohio, Inc. (Interest Rate) »
Defendant: Eagle Loan Company of Ohio, Inc.
Ohio residents who obtained a loan from Eagle Financial Services with an interest rate higher than 21% from August 18, 2008 and August 31, 2015 may be eligible for an estimated $40 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of charging higher interest rate than allowed by Ohio law. ×The Cosmopolitan (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas
California residents who placed or received telephone calls from Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas between July 12, 2011 and August 3, 2012 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $14.5 million settlement. The company reached a… Read More »
The Cosmopolitan (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas
California residents who placed or received telephone calls from Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas between July 12, 2011 and August 3, 2012 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $14.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of recording telephone calls without notice or consent of California residents.
×Anheuser-Busch InBev (Beck’s) »
Defendant: Anheuser-Busch InBev
Consumers who bought Beck’s beer between May 1, 2011 and June 23, 2015 may be eligible for up to $50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely misrepresenting Beck’s beer as being brewed and imported from Germany when instead the beers were domestically brewed. Read More »
Anheuser-Busch InBev (Beck’s) »
Defendant: Anheuser-Busch InBev
Source: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/06/24/becks-beer-fans-can-get-refunds-in-class-action-settlement/
Consumers who bought Beck’s beer between May 1, 2011 and June 23, 2015 may be eligible for up to $50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely misrepresenting Beck’s beer as being brewed and imported from Germany when instead the beers were domestically brewed.
×StarKist Co. (Tuna) »
Defendant: StarKist Co.
Consumers who bought certain StarKist 5 oz. canned tuna products between February 19, 2009 and October 31, 2014 may be eligible for $25 cash or $50 voucher for StarKist tuna products. The company reached a settlement over allegations of under-filling the amount tuna in the 5 oz. canned tuna products.… Read More »
StarKist Co. (Tuna) »
Defendant: StarKist Co.
Consumers who bought certain StarKist 5 oz. canned tuna products between February 19, 2009 and October 31, 2014 may be eligible for $25 cash or $50 voucher for StarKist tuna products. The company reached a settlement over allegations of under-filling the amount tuna in the 5 oz. canned tuna products.
×Pre-Employ, Inc. (FCRA) »
Defendant: Pre-Employ, Inc.
The lawsuit alleges that Pre-Employ failed to provide complete and up to date information of consumer reports provided to third parties in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who were the subject of background reports from October 16, 2011 to August 17, 2015 and whose reports were later… Read More »
Pre-Employ, Inc. (FCRA) »
Defendant: Pre-Employ, Inc.
The lawsuit alleges that Pre-Employ failed to provide complete and up to date information of consumer reports provided to third parties in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who were the subject of background reports from October 16, 2011 to August 17, 2015 and whose reports were later corrected by Pre-Employ due to inaccurate, incomplete, or not up to date information may be eligible for $150 cash. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Hearing is Jan. 27, 2016.
×Templeton Rye (Whiskey) »
Defendant: Templeton Rye Spirits, LLC
Consumers who bought Templeton Rye whiskey products between January 1, 2006 and July 21, 2015 may be eligible for up to $36 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose that the product was distilled in Indiana instead of Iowa as advertised. Read More »
Templeton Rye (Whiskey) »
Defendant: Templeton Rye Spirits, LLC
Consumers who bought Templeton Rye whiskey products between January 1, 2006 and July 21, 2015 may be eligible for up to $36 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose that the product was distilled in Indiana instead of Iowa as advertised.
×Gallup (TCPA) »
Defendant: Gallup
United States residents who received a survey call to their cell phone by way of an automatic telephone dialing system between August 16, 2009 and August 16, 2015 may be eligible for pro rata share of the $12 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »
Gallup (TCPA) »
Defendant: Gallup
United States residents who received a survey call to their cell phone by way of an automatic telephone dialing system between August 16, 2009 and August 16, 2015 may be eligible for pro rata share of the $12 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Golden 1 Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: Golden 1 Credit Union
Consumers may be eligible for a share of the $5 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fee when they had a positive balance in their checking account between April 2, 2009 and April 30, 2015. Consumers may be eligible for a share of the $5 million settlement if they… Read More »
Golden 1 Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: Golden 1 Credit Union
Consumers may be eligible for a share of the $5 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fee when they had a positive balance in their checking account between April 2, 2009 and April 30, 2015. Consumers may be eligible for a share of the $5 million settlement if they opted-in on Golden 1 Credit Union’s website for the Courtesy Pay of Everyday Debit Card Transactions program on certain dates and charged overdraft fees for debit card transactions between the certain opt-in dates and April 30, 2015.
×