Deadlines Calendar

« September 2024 »

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

View Large Calendar


Class Action by Status


'closed' Listing

FTD.com (Substitution Policy) »

Defendant: FTD.com

California consumers who ordered and paid for a floral arrangement from April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2015 and received a substitution in their floral arrangement may be eligible for $20 coupon or $8.50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to properly disclose FTD.com’s substitution of… Read More »

FTD.com (Substitution Policy) »

Defendant: FTD.com

California consumers who ordered and paid for a floral arrangement from April 1, 2011 to March 31, 2015 and received a substitution in their floral arrangement may be eligible for $20 coupon or $8.50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to properly disclose FTD.com’s substitution of floral arrangements policy.

Read More »

×

LifeLock, Inc. (Automatic Renewal) »

Defendant: LifeLock, Inc.

California residents who are current or former LifeLock subscribers between December 1, 2010 and July 24, 2015 and paid at least one auto renewed monthly or annual membership fees may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of… Read More »

LifeLock, Inc. (Automatic Renewal) »

Defendant: LifeLock, Inc.

California residents who are current or former LifeLock subscribers between December 1, 2010 and July 24, 2015 and paid at least one auto renewed monthly or annual membership fees may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violating California’s Automatic Renewal Law by failing to disclose that the membership is automatically renewed. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Hearing is Feb. 5, 2016.

Read More »

×

Swarovski (Personal Identification Information) »

Defendant: Swarovski

California consumers whose personal identification information was requested and recorded during a credit card transaction between May 23, 2012 and July 2, 2015 at Swarovski stores may be eligible to receive either a $15 voucher (no minimum purchase) or $50 voucher off any merchandise purchase of $150 or more at… Read More »

Swarovski (Personal Identification Information) »

Defendant: Swarovski

California consumers whose personal identification information was requested and recorded during a credit card transaction between May 23, 2012 and July 2, 2015 at Swarovski stores may be eligible to receive either a $15 voucher (no minimum purchase) or $50 voucher off any merchandise purchase of $150 or more at a California Swarovski store.

Read More »

×

True Religion Apparel, Inc. (“Made in USA”) »

Defendant: True Religion Apparel, Inc.

Consumers who bought True Religion Apparel product between December 10, 2010 and July 31, 2015 with the label “Made in USA” when there were some parts that were not made in USA may be eligible for one True Religion Apparel t-shirt.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly… Read More »

True Religion Apparel, Inc. (“Made in USA”) »

Defendant: True Religion Apparel, Inc.

Consumers who bought True Religion Apparel product between December 10, 2010 and July 31, 2015 with the label “Made in USA” when there were some parts that were not made in USA may be eligible for one True Religion Apparel t-shirt.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling and advertising the product as “Made in USA” when it contained some foreign made parts.

Read More »

×

Infinity Staffing (FCRA) »

Defendant: Infinity Staffing

The lawsuit alleges that Infinity Staffing failed to clearly disclose that the background checks would be obtained for employment purposes in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who were the subject of employment background reports through the use of the form “Authorization for Release of Information” from December… Read More »

Infinity Staffing (FCRA) »

Defendant: Infinity Staffing

The lawsuit alleges that Infinity Staffing failed to clearly disclose that the background checks would be obtained for employment purposes in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who were the subject of employment background reports through the use of the form “Authorization for Release of Information” from December 6, 2011 to August 21, 2015 may be eligible for $110 cash. Individuals who were the subject of employment background reports and had adverse employment action taken against them based on the background reports between December 6, 2011 and August 21, 2015 may be eligible for $1,000 cash. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Hearing is Jan. 11, 2016

Read More »

×

Commonwealth Edison (TCPA) »

Defendant: Commonwealth Edison

Consumers who received unauthorized text messages regarding subscription to Commonwealth Edison outage alerts may be eligible for $50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.    Read More »

Commonwealth Edison (TCPA) »

Defendant: Commonwealth Edison

Consumers who received unauthorized text messages regarding subscription to Commonwealth Edison outage alerts may be eligible for $50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Read More »

×

Mortgage Investors Corporation (TCPA) »

Defendant: Mortgage Investors Corporation

Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones or two or more calls to their phone number that is listed on the National Do Not Call Registry from Mortgage Investors Corporation on or after April 18, 2010 may be eligible for up to $40 cash. The company reached a… Read More »

Mortgage Investors Corporation (TCPA) »

Defendant: Mortgage Investors Corporation

Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones or two or more calls to their phone number that is listed on the National Do Not Call Registry from Mortgage Investors Corporation on or after April 18, 2010 may be eligible for up to $40 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Read More »

×

Nutro Co. (Ultra Dry Dog Kibble and Ultra Dog Biscuits) »

Defendant: Nutro Co.

Consumers (except California residents) who bought certain Ultra dry dog kibble from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2009 and/or Ultra Dog Biscuits from April 1, 2007 to April 30, 2011 may be eligible for $2 cash or $5 merchandise certificate or donation of dry kibble product worth $5 to… Read More »

Nutro Co. (Ultra Dry Dog Kibble and Ultra Dog Biscuits) »

Defendant: Nutro Co.

Consumers (except California residents) who bought certain Ultra dry dog kibble from April 1, 2007 to June 30, 2009 and/or Ultra Dog Biscuits from April 1, 2007 to April 30, 2011 may be eligible for $2 cash or $5 merchandise certificate or donation of dry kibble product worth $5 to animal shelters/charities.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling the products with a “Guaranteed Analysis” regarding the amount of Bacillus species in the dog food products.

Read More »

×

Charming Charlie Inc. (Personal Identification Information) »

Defendant: Charming Charlie Inc.

California consumers whose personal identification information was requested and recorded during a credit card transaction by Charming Charlie Store between July 9, 2013 and July 29, 2015 may be eligible for a voucher of $20.     Read More »

Charming Charlie Inc. (Personal Identification Information) »

Defendant: Charming Charlie Inc.

California consumers whose personal identification information was requested and recorded during a credit card transaction by Charming Charlie Store between July 9, 2013 and July 29, 2015 may be eligible for a voucher of $20. 

Read More »

×

Mercedes-Benz (Balance Shaft Sprockets) »

Defendant: Mercedes-Benz

The lawsuit alleges that a defect in balance shaft sprockets in certain 2005-2007 Mercedes-Benz vehicles with M272 and M273 causes the gears to wear prematurely.  Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs or cash reimbursement for repair expenses.     Read More »

Mercedes-Benz (Balance Shaft Sprockets) »

Defendant: Mercedes-Benz

The lawsuit alleges that a defect in balance shaft sprockets in certain 2005-2007 Mercedes-Benz vehicles with M272 and M273 causes the gears to wear prematurely.  Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs or cash reimbursement for repair expenses. 

Read More »

×

Schiff Nutrition (Glucosamine Joint Health Supplement) »

Defendant: Schiff Nutrition International

Consumers who bought certain Schiff joint health products from January 1, 2005 and May 27, 2015 may be eligible for up to $50 cash.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of false advertisement and failure to warn on potential harmful side effects.    Read More »

Schiff Nutrition (Glucosamine Joint Health Supplement) »

Defendant: Schiff Nutrition International

Consumers who bought certain Schiff joint health products from January 1, 2005 and May 27, 2015 may be eligible for up to $50 cash.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of false advertisement and failure to warn on potential harmful side effects.

Read More »

×

Peg Perego (“Made in USA”) »

Defendant: Peg Perego

Consumers who bought Peg Perego children’s riding vehicle between August 11, 2010 and December 31, 2014 with the unqualified label “Made in USA” may be eligible for a safety vest product worth $20 from Peg Perego.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling and advertising the product… Read More »

Peg Perego (“Made in USA”) »

Defendant: Peg Perego

Consumers who bought Peg Perego children’s riding vehicle between August 11, 2010 and December 31, 2014 with the unqualified label “Made in USA” may be eligible for a safety vest product worth $20 from Peg Perego.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling and advertising the product as “Made in USA” when it was not.

Read More »

×

Lenovo (Ultrabook Wi-Fi Connectivity) »

Defendant: Lenovo

Consumers who bought Lenovo Ideapad® model U310 or Lenovo Ideapad® model U410 computer may be eligible for up to $100 cash or $250 credit certificate.  Consumers who have not returned their computer for repair can choose to return the computer to Lenovo for repairs and receive an additional year of… Read More »

Lenovo (Ultrabook Wi-Fi Connectivity) »

Defendant: Lenovo

Consumers who bought Lenovo Ideapad® model U310 or Lenovo Ideapad® model U410 computer may be eligible for up to $100 cash or $250 credit certificate.  Consumers who have not returned their computer for repair can choose to return the computer to Lenovo for repairs and receive an additional year of warranty but will not be eligible for $100 cash or $250 credit certificate.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of selling certain computers with design defects that affects the Wi-Fi connectivity of the computers.

Read More »

×

Howard Johnson International (Telephone Recording) »

Defendant: Howard Johnson International

California residents who called Howard Johnson toll-free reservations from February 28, 2011 to March 23, 2012 and did not consent to the recordings may be eligible for up to $5000.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of recording telephone calls without notice or consent of California residents.    Read More »

Howard Johnson International (Telephone Recording) »

Defendant: Howard Johnson International

California residents who called Howard Johnson toll-free reservations from February 28, 2011 to March 23, 2012 and did not consent to the recordings may be eligible for up to $5000.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of recording telephone calls without notice or consent of California residents.

Read More »

×

Chase (TCPA) »

Defendant: Chase

Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Chase’s auto subline of business between November 18, 2009 and May 19, 2015 may be eligible for between $45 to $55 cash.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.    Read More »

Chase (TCPA) »

Defendant: Chase

Consumers who received automated call on their cell phones from Chase’s auto subline of business between November 18, 2009 and May 19, 2015 may be eligible for between $45 to $55 cash.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Read More »

×