Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Lifetime (Basketball) »
Defendant: Lifetime Products. Inc.
Consumers who bought a Lifetime Products. Inc. basketball that was labeled as “Made in USA” between April 11, 2007 and December 31, 2012 may be eligible for one basketball of a certain model and either $12.50 or $30 merchandise certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresentation the… Read More »
Lifetime (Basketball) »
Defendant: Lifetime Products. Inc.
Consumers who bought a Lifetime Products. Inc. basketball that was labeled as “Made in USA” between April 11, 2007 and December 31, 2012 may be eligible for one basketball of a certain model and either $12.50 or $30 merchandise certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresentation the country of origin of the basketball products when the products contained Chinese made component parts.
×Mario Badescu Skin Care »
Defendant: Mario Badescu Skin Care
Consumers who bought Mario Badescu Healing Cream or Control Cream since February 15, 2009 may be eligible for up to two $45 settlement certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failure to disclose all the ingredients in its products. Read More »
Mario Badescu Skin Care »
Defendant: Mario Badescu Skin Care
Consumers who bought Mario Badescu Healing Cream or Control Cream since February 15, 2009 may be eligible for up to two $45 settlement certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failure to disclose all the ingredients in its products.
×BMW (MINI) »
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
The lawsuit alleges that the CVT of certain 2005-2008 MINI vehicles are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for out of pocket repair expenses and warranty extension. Read More »
BMW (MINI) »
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
The lawsuit alleges that the CVT of certain 2005-2008 MINI vehicles are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for out of pocket repair expenses and warranty extension.
×AvMed (Personal Information) »
Defendant: AvMed, Inc
Current and former customers who purchased insurance prior to December 2009 and whose sensitive personal information was in the stolen laptops may be eligible for up to $30 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the company failed to adequately protect the sensitive personal information of its customers. … Read More »
AvMed (Personal Information) »
Defendant: AvMed, Inc
Current and former customers who purchased insurance prior to December 2009 and whose sensitive personal information was in the stolen laptops may be eligible for up to $30 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the company failed to adequately protect the sensitive personal information of its customers.
×Bayer (Cipro) »
Defendant: Bayer
California consumers who purchased the prescription antibiotic drug Cipro between January 8, 1997 and October 31, 2004 maybe eligible for $25. The company reached a settlement over allegations of antitrust violations. Read More »
Bayer (Cipro) »
Defendant: Bayer
California consumers who purchased the prescription antibiotic drug Cipro between January 8, 1997 and October 31, 2004 maybe eligible for $25. The company reached a settlement over allegations of antitrust violations.
×Ticketmaster (TicketsNow.com) »
Defendant: Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc.
Consumers who were redirected from ticketmaster.com to TicketsNow.com and purchased tickets on TicketsNow.com between April 1, 2008 and February 5, 2009 may be eligible for a one-time rebate of 18.5% of the total ticket purchase transaction up to $100 or $10 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations that… Read More »
Ticketmaster (TicketsNow.com) »
Defendant: Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc.
Consumers who were redirected from ticketmaster.com to TicketsNow.com and purchased tickets on TicketsNow.com between April 1, 2008 and February 5, 2009 may be eligible for a one-time rebate of 18.5% of the total ticket purchase transaction up to $100 or $10 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the company mislead the consumers into buying more expensive tickets on the partnering website TicketsNow.com when event tickets were still available at face value on ticketmaster.com.
×Alacer (Emergen-C) »
Defendant: Alacer
Consumers who bought certain Emergen-C products between June 1, 2006 and February 27, 2012 may be eligible for up to $36 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false and deceptive advertisement of certain claims on the labels. Read More »
Alacer (Emergen-C) »
Defendant: Alacer
Consumers who bought certain Emergen-C products between June 1, 2006 and February 27, 2012 may be eligible for up to $36 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false and deceptive advertisement of certain claims on the labels.
×ebook (antitrust) »
Defendant: Hachette; HarperCollins; Simon & Schuster; Macmillan; Penguin
The companies reached a settlement over allegations of conspiracy to fix and raise retail prices of E-books. Consumers may be eligible for partial refunds if they purchased E-books between April 1, 2010 and May 21, 2012 that were published by the following companies: • Hachette Book Group, Inc. (“Hachette”); •… Read More »
ebook (antitrust) »
Defendant: Hachette; HarperCollins; Simon & Schuster; Macmillan; Penguin
The companies reached a settlement over allegations of conspiracy to fix and raise retail prices of E-books. Consumers may be eligible for partial refunds if they purchased E-books between April 1, 2010 and May 21, 2012 that were published by the following companies:
• Hachette Book Group, Inc. (“Hachette”);
• HarperCollins Publishers LLC (“HarperCollins”);
• Simon & Schuster, Inc. and Simon & Schuster Digital Sales, Inc. (“Simon & Schuster”);
• Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC, known as Macmillan (“Macmillan”); and
• Penguin Group (USA) Inc. (“Penguin”).
On March 25, 2014, credit notification emails were sent out to eligible consumers. On March 27, 2014, postcard checks were mailed to eligible consumers.
Credits that are not used and checks that are not cashed by April 1, 2015 will be void.
×eBay (Featured Plus!) »
Defendant: eBay
Consumers who paid Featured Plus! fees from January 23, 2008 to February 4, 2013 may be eligible for a share of $4.75 million settlement fund. The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly describing the Featured Plus! operation. Read More »
eBay (Featured Plus!) »
Defendant: eBay
Consumers who paid Featured Plus! fees from January 23, 2008 to February 4, 2013 may be eligible for a share of $4.75 million settlement fund. The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly describing the Featured Plus! operation.
×Aetna (Out-of-Network Provider) »
Defendant: Aetna
The lawsuit alleges that Aetna made inadequate reimbursements for out-of-network medical services and supplies. There is a preliminary settlement fund of $120 million for (1) Aetna plan members who received covered services or supplies from out-of-network medical providers between March 1, 2001 and August 30, 2013 and (2) out-of-network medical… Read More »
Aetna (Out-of-Network Provider) »
Defendant: Aetna
The lawsuit alleges that Aetna made inadequate reimbursements for out-of-network medical services and supplies. There is a preliminary settlement fund of $120 million for (1) Aetna plan members who received covered services or supplies from out-of-network medical providers between March 1, 2001 and August 30, 2013 and (2) out-of-network medical providers whose covered services and supplies to Aetna plan members were partially reimbursed from June 3, 2003 to August 30, 2013.
×Organix Hair Care »
Defendant: Organix Hair Care
400 words shown here. A proposed settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit about the labeling and advertising of Organix brand hair care and skin care products ("Products"). The plaintiffs in the lawsuit claim that the packaging and advertising of these Products misled consumers to believe that the… Read More »
Organix Hair Care »
Defendant: Organix Hair Care
Source: http://www.lexlawgroup.com/
400 words shown here.
A proposed settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit about the labeling and advertising of Organix brand hair care and skin care products ("Products"). The plaintiffs in the lawsuit claim that the packaging and advertising of these Products misled consumers to believe that the Products were wholly organic. The maker of the Products, Todd Christopher International, Inc., which does business as Vogue International, denies all the plaintiffs' allegations and is entering into this settlement to avoid burdensome and costly litigation. The settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing. The Court has not decided who is right and who is wrong.
Am I a Class Member? You are a Class Member if you bought at least one of the Products at any time on or after October 25, 2008.
A fund of $6.5 million will be created to pay Class Members for a portion of the cost of Products they purchased and to pay for notice and claim administration costs of up to $650,000 and attorneys' fees and costs of up to $1.625 million. Any remaining money in the fund will be donated to one or more non-profit charitable organizations. Such funds will not be returned to Todd Christopher International, Inc.
If you are a Class Member, you may return a Claim Form to receive $4 for each of the Products you purchased, up to a total of $28 per Class Member. A detailed Class Notice and copies of the Claim Form are available at the 'Important Documents' section of this website, by calling (855) 887-3482 or writing to Organix Class Settlement, Claims Administrator, Heffler Claims Group, P.O. Box 59029, Philadelphia, PA 19102.
To receive a cash payment you must submit a Claim Form no later than March 17, 2014. If you do nothing, you will get no money from the Settlement. If you do not wish to participate in the settlement and be bound by its terms, you may exclude yourself from the Class by February 5, 2014. If you exclude yourself, you can't get money from this settlement if it is approved, but you retain your right to sue regarding these claims. If you wish to object to the settlement, you must stay in the Class and object to it by February 5, 2014. This is only a summary. Visit the 'Important Documents' section of this website for important information about these options.
×Wal-Mart (Miley Cyrus Branded Jewelry) »
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Consumers who bought Miley Cyrus branded jewelry from Walmart after July 1, 2005 may be eligible for up to $6 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the jewelry contained cadmium. Read More »
Wal-Mart (Miley Cyrus Branded Jewelry) »
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Consumers who bought Miley Cyrus branded jewelry from Walmart after July 1, 2005 may be eligible for up to $6 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the jewelry contained cadmium.
×Bank of America (TCPA) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Consumers who received automatic non-emergency mortgage or credit card default servicing call or text on their cell phones from Bank of America between August 30, 2007 and January 31, 2013 may be eligible for up to $40 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone… Read More »
Bank of America (TCPA) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Consumers who received automatic non-emergency mortgage or credit card default servicing call or text on their cell phones from Bank of America between August 30, 2007 and January 31, 2013 may be eligible for up to $40 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×American Express (Gift Card) »
Defendant: American Express
Consumers who purchased, received, held, or used an American Express gift card between January 1, 2002 and September 21, 2011 may be eligible for up to $40. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose the full terms and conditions of the gift cards. Read More »
American Express (Gift Card) »
Defendant: American Express
Consumers who purchased, received, held, or used an American Express gift card between January 1, 2002 and September 21, 2011 may be eligible for up to $40. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose the full terms and conditions of the gift cards.
×Hi‐Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc (Nasal Ease) »
Defendant: Hi‐Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc
Consumers who bought Nasal Ease between April 1, 2010 and February 25, 2014 may be eligible for a refund or up to $15 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising that its product temporarily relieves allergy symptoms. Read More »
Hi‐Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc (Nasal Ease) »
Defendant: Hi‐Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc
Consumers who bought Nasal Ease between April 1, 2010 and February 25, 2014 may be eligible for a refund or up to $15 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising that its product temporarily relieves allergy symptoms.
×