Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Discover Financial Services (Telemarketing) »
Defendant: Discover Financial Services
Consumers who received pre-recorded telemarketing phone calls on their cell phones on or after November 30, 2007 may be eligible for up to $40 cash. Read More »
Discover Financial Services (Telemarketing) »
Defendant: Discover Financial Services
Consumers who received pre-recorded telemarketing phone calls on their cell phones on or after November 30, 2007 may be eligible for up to $40 cash.
×LG (G2x Mobile Phone) »
Defendant: LG
Consumers who bought an LG G2x mobile phone and complained to LG or T-Mobile about the shutdown or screen bleed defect from April 15, 2011 to October 30, 2013 may be eligible for up to $19 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of selling defective phones that repeatedly… Read More »
LG (G2x Mobile Phone) »
Defendant: LG
Consumers who bought an LG G2x mobile phone and complained to LG or T-Mobile about the shutdown or screen bleed defect from April 15, 2011 to October 30, 2013 may be eligible for up to $19 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of selling defective phones that repeatedly shut down or leak backlight from the edges of the phones’ screens.
×OfficeMax (Zip Code) »
Defendant: Office Max
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between March 1, 2010 and February 22, 2011 at OfficeMax stores in California. Class members may be eligible to receive $10 merchandise voucher for use at a California OfficeMax retail store. Read More »
OfficeMax (Zip Code) »
Defendant: Office Max
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between March 1, 2010 and February 22, 2011 at OfficeMax stores in California. Class members may be eligible to receive $10 merchandise voucher for use at a California OfficeMax retail store.
×Southwest Airlines (Credit or Debit Card Transaction) »
Defendant: Southwest Airlines
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions at the airport or cargo counters and received an electronically-printed receipt contained the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between October 17, 2007 and October 21, 2012 may be eligible to receive a pro rata share of the $1.8… Read More »
Southwest Airlines (Credit or Debit Card Transaction) »
Defendant: Southwest Airlines
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions at the airport or cargo counters and received an electronically-printed receipt contained the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between October 17, 2007 and October 21, 2012 may be eligible to receive a pro rata share of the $1.8 million settlement.
×Kohl’s (Zip Code) »
Defendant: Kohl's
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between April 16, 2009 and November 26, 2013 at Kohl’s stores in Massachusetts. Class members may be eligible to receive a Kohl’s gift card. Read More »
Kohl’s (Zip Code) »
Defendant: Kohl's
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between April 16, 2009 and November 26, 2013 at Kohl’s stores in Massachusetts. Class members may be eligible to receive a Kohl’s gift card.
×Apple iPad (Data Plan) »
Defendant: Apple Inc. ("Apple") and AT&T Mobility LLC
Consumers who purchased or ordered an iPad 3G on or before June 7, 2010 may be eligible for $40 cash per iPad 3G. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising unlimited data plan when consumers were not provided with access to an unlimited data plan. Read More »
Apple iPad (Data Plan) »
Defendant: Apple Inc. ("Apple") and AT&T Mobility LLC
Consumers who purchased or ordered an iPad 3G on or before June 7, 2010 may be eligible for $40 cash per iPad 3G. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising unlimited data plan when consumers were not provided with access to an unlimited data plan.
×McCormick & Schmick’s (Kobe Beef) »
Defendant: McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurants, Inc.
California consumers who purchased any menu item that was advertised to contain “Kobe” beef between July 10, 2008 and July 15, 2012 may be eligible for $10 or $15 settlement certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “Kobe” beef as containing beef from the “Wagyu” bloodline… Read More »
McCormick & Schmick’s (Kobe Beef) »
Defendant: McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurants, Inc.
California consumers who purchased any menu item that was advertised to contain “Kobe” beef between July 10, 2008 and July 15, 2012 may be eligible for $10 or $15 settlement certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “Kobe” beef as containing beef from the “Wagyu” bloodline of cattle in the Kobe region of Japan.
×BP (Gasoline) »
Defendant: BP
Residents of certain states who purchased gasoline at certain retail outlets between August 13, 2012 and September 7, 2012 and experienced engine or drivability issues may be eligible for reimbursement of gasoline purchase price, cost of repairs, and additional expenses associated with repairs. Read More »
BP (Gasoline) »
Defendant: BP
Residents of certain states who purchased gasoline at certain retail outlets between August 13, 2012 and September 7, 2012 and experienced engine or drivability issues may be eligible for reimbursement of gasoline purchase price, cost of repairs, and additional expenses associated with repairs.
×Philips AirFloss (Philips Sonicare AirFloss) »
Defendant:
California consumers who purchased Philips Sonicare AirFloss between January 1, 2011 and June 24, 2013 may be eligible for up to $33 voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the benefits of AirFloss. Deadline is Jan. 20, 2014. Read More »
Philips AirFloss (Philips Sonicare AirFloss) »
Defendant:
California consumers who purchased Philips Sonicare AirFloss between January 1, 2011 and June 24, 2013 may be eligible for up to $33 voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the benefits of AirFloss. Deadline is Jan. 20, 2014.
×Honda (Civic Suspension) »
Defendant: Honda Civic
The lawsuit alleges that the suspension of certain 2006-2008 Honda vehicles caused premature or uneven rear tire wear. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses. Deadline is Jan. 16, 2014. Read More »
Honda (Civic Suspension) »
Defendant: Honda Civic
The lawsuit alleges that the suspension of certain 2006-2008 Honda vehicles caused premature or uneven rear tire wear. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses. Deadline is Jan. 16, 2014.
×Rawlings Power Balance Issue »
Defendant: Rawlings Power Balance
Rawlings Power Balance Consumers who purchased certain Rawlings Power Balance products between March 1, 2010 and October 11, 2013 may be eligible for up to $16.50 per bracelet or a total refund. Click here for details. Deadline is Jan. 8, 2014. Read More »
Rawlings Power Balance Issue »
Defendant: Rawlings Power Balance
Rawlings Power Balance Consumers who purchased certain Rawlings Power Balance products between March 1, 2010 and October 11, 2013 may be eligible for up to $16.50 per bracelet or a total refund. Click here for details. Deadline is Jan. 8, 2014.
×Ford Navistar Diesel Engine »
Defendant: Ford Navistar Diesel Engine
The lawsuit alleges that the 6.0-liter PowerStroke diesel engine of certain 2003-2007 Ford vehicles are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses. Click here for details and claim form. Deadline for claim forms is Dec. 31, 2013. Read More »
Ford Navistar Diesel Engine »
Defendant: Ford Navistar Diesel Engine
The lawsuit alleges that the 6.0-liter PowerStroke diesel engine of certain 2003-2007 Ford vehicles are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses. Click here for details and claim form. Deadline for claim forms is Dec. 31, 2013.
×L’Occitane (Credit Card Transaction) »
Defendant: L’Occitane
L’Occitane California consumers whose personal identification information was requested and recorded by L’Occitane stores during a credit card transaction between September 9, 2011 and October 4, 2013 may be eligible for a merchandise certificate of $12.50. Read More »
L’Occitane (Credit Card Transaction) »
Defendant: L’Occitane
L’Occitane California consumers whose personal identification information was requested and recorded by L’Occitane stores during a credit card transaction between September 9, 2011 and October 4, 2013 may be eligible for a merchandise certificate of $12.50.
×Chipotle rounds up purchases »
Defendant: Chipotle
Californians who bought something at Chipotle from August 30, 2008 to the present are eligible to join the class in Overton v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, which alleges that the chain always overcharged customers by rounding bills up to the nearest nickle. Click here to download the case. Read More »
Chipotle rounds up purchases »
Defendant: Chipotle
Californians who bought something at Chipotle from August 30, 2008 to the present are eligible to join the class in Overton v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, which alleges that the chain always overcharged customers by rounding bills up to the nearest nickle. Click here to download the case.
×Virtuoso Sourcing Group (Debt Collection) »
Defendant:
Those who received a letter from Virtuoso Sourcing Group that failed to contain the name of the creditor between November 2, 2010 and September 29, 2012 may be eligible to receive a pro rata share of the $40,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations that violations of the… Read More »
Virtuoso Sourcing Group (Debt Collection) »
Defendant:
Those who received a letter from Virtuoso Sourcing Group that failed to contain the name of the creditor between November 2, 2010 and September 29, 2012 may be eligible to receive a pro rata share of the $40,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations that violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
×