Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Ford (Sudden Acceleration) »
Defendant: Ford
Alleges that Ford knowingly sold defective electronic throttle control system in certain Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury models, causing unintended acceleration. The case is Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co., Case No. 3:2013cv06529, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Read More »
Ford (Sudden Acceleration) »
Defendant: Ford
Source: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/consumers-bring-product-liability-class-action-against-ford-alleging-defects-causing-uni
Alleges that Ford knowingly sold defective electronic throttle control system in certain Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury models, causing unintended acceleration. The case is Belville et al v. Ford Motor Co., Case No. 3:2013cv06529, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.
×Junk debt collection lawsuits »
Defendant: Mel Harris & Associates
In Monique Sykes et al. v. Harris, as many as 100,000 individuals could be entitled to damages for default judgments allegedly obtained without serving the defendants with court papers. The suit contends that a law firm (Mel Harris & Associates), its client consumer debt purchaser and a process serving company… Read More »
Junk debt collection lawsuits »
Defendant: Mel Harris & Associates
In Monique Sykes et al. v. Harris, as many as 100,000 individuals could be entitled to damages for default judgments allegedly obtained without serving the defendants with court papers. The suit contends that a law firm (Mel Harris & Associates), its client consumer debt purchaser and a process serving company schemed to obtain thousands of default judgments in state court via bogus service documentation ("sewer service") and false affidavits. When the consumers failed to appear in court because they did not receive notice of the lawsuits, the defendants obtained default judgments against them. Some of the charges allege violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the lawsuit also asserts that the companies conspired under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
×Capital One (Credit Add-On Products) »
Defendant:
$210 million settlement fund in case alleging improper conduct regarding the marketing, enrollment, pricing, and administration practices relating to credit add-on products. No action required is required of class members, who will receive an automatic credit on their Capital One credit cards if still cardholders. Checks will be mailed to… Read More »
Capital One (Credit Add-On Products) »
Defendant:
$210 million settlement fund in case alleging improper conduct regarding the marketing, enrollment, pricing, and administration practices relating to credit add-on products. No action required is required of class members, who will receive an automatic credit on their Capital One credit cards if still cardholders. Checks will be mailed to affected individuals who are no longer cardholders. If you are a former cardholder or a current cardholder and your contact information at the company is out of date, update your contact information. Click here to learn more at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
×- Previous Page
- 40
- 41
- 42
(42 pages)